Comparison of Budesonide/ Formoterol Fumarate and Fluticasone Furoate/ Vilanterol for Asthma Control.

Introduction: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting \beta_2-agonist (LABA) combinations are central to moderate-to-severe persistent asthma management. Budesonide/Formoterol (BUD/FOR) and Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol (FF/VI) differ fundamentally in dosing frequency, receptor binding affinity, and delivery devices. Objectives: To evaluate and compare changes in asthma symptom control using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), pulmonary function parameters via spirometry (PFT), and inhaler compliance using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) between BUD/FOR and FF/VI regimens Methods: An ambispective observational study was conducted at Lourdes Hospital, Ernakulam, comprising 130 adult asthma patients (BUD/FOR: n = 62; FF/VI: n = 68). Patients received face-to-face inhaler technique counseling augmented by a QR-code instructional leaflet. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at baseline and after 3 months of follow-up using spirometric parameters (FVC, \text{FEV}1, \text{FEV}_1/\text{FVC}, \text{FEF}{25\text{--}75\%}, \text{FEF}_{75\text{--}85\%}), the 5-item ACT survey, and the 12-item TAI questionnaire. Data were analyzed using paired/independent t-tests and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Both cohorts showed significant baseline-to-endpoint gains in FVC and \text{FEV}1 (p < 0.01). FF/VI demonstrated superior small-airway improvements, with significant increases in \text{FEF}{25\text{--}75\%} (58.21 \pm 19.80\% to 72.79 \pm 17.67\%, p = 0.0001) and \text{FEF}_{75\text{--}85\%} (p = 0.048), whereas BUD/FOR showed no significant small-airway change (p = 0.137). Well-controlled asthma (\text{ACT} \ge 20) was achieved by 67.6\% of patients in the FF/VI cohort compared to 46.9\% in the BUD/FOR cohort. Categorical adherence improvement on the TAI scale reached statistical significance only in the once-daily FF/VI group (p = 0.0001; BUD/FOR: p = 0.613). Conclusions: While both combinations provide robust bronchodilation and symptom relief, once-daily FF/VI demonstrated superior small-airway recovery, higher rates of categorical symptom control, and statistically significant enhancements in inhaler adherence relative to twice-daily BUD/FOR.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of chemical health risks
Published
2026-11-02
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Budesonide/ Formoterol Fumarate and Fluticasone Furoate/ Vilanterol for Asthma Control.

Betty P Suresh
Journal of chemical health risks
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Comparison of Budesonide/ Formoterol Fumarate and Fluticasone Furoate/ Vilanterol for Asthma Control.

Betty P Suresh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting \beta_2-agonist (LABA) combinations are central to moderate-to-severe persistent asthma management. Budesonide/Formoterol (BUD/FOR) and Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol (FF/VI) differ fundamentally in dosing frequency, receptor binding affinity, and delivery devices. Objectives: To evaluate and compare changes in asthma symptom control using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), pulmonary function parameters via spirometry (PFT), and inhaler compliance using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) between BUD/FOR and FF/VI regimens Methods: An ambispective observational study was conducted at Lourdes Hospital, Ernakulam, comprising 130 adult asthma patients (BUD/FOR: n = 62; FF/VI: n = 68). Patients received face-to-face inhaler technique counseling augmented by a QR-code instructional leaflet. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at baseline and after 3 months of follow-up using spirometric parameters (FVC, \text{FEV}1, \text{FEV}_1/\text{FVC}, \text{FEF}{25\text{--}75\%}, \text{FEF}_{75\text{--}85\%}), the 5-item ACT survey, and the 12-item TAI questionnaire. Data were analyzed using paired/independent t-tests and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Both cohorts showed significant baseline-to-endpoint gains in FVC and \text{FEV}1 (p < 0.01). FF/VI demonstrated superior small-airway improvements, with significant increases in \text{FEF}{25\text{--}75\%} (58.21 \pm 19.80\% to 72.79 \pm 17.67\%, p = 0.0001) and \text{FEF}_{75\text{--}85\%} (p = 0.048), whereas BUD/FOR showed no significant small-airway change (p = 0.137). Well-controlled asthma (\text{ACT} \ge 20) was achieved by 67.6\% of patients in the FF/VI cohort compared to 46.9\% in the BUD/FOR cohort. Categorical adherence improvement on the TAI scale reached statistical significance only in the once-daily FF/VI group (p = 0.0001; BUD/FOR: p = 0.613). Conclusions: While both combinations provide robust bronchodilation and symptom relief, once-daily FF/VI demonstrated superior small-airway recovery, higher rates of categorical symptom control, and statistically significant enhancements in inhaler adherence relative to twice-daily BUD/FOR.

Journal of chemical health risks
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon