Shadow AI. When Users Move Faster Than the Institution

Physicians increasingly use generative AI without institutional approval. This essay interprets such shadow AI less as individual misconduct than as the result of an unusually large speed gap between technological adoption and institutional integration, that is, a reversal of the direction of diffusion from user to institution. Besides time pressure, the pull of the technology itself is discussed as an explanation. A blanket ban without an alternative may push use into areas that are hard to control; this relationship is a hypothesis. Data risk, decision risk and epistemic risk are distinguished. The institutional answer proposed is an internal alternative, visibility and competence, with the caveat that visibility is not yet control. The essay draws on surveys, peer-reviewed studies and regulatory sources up to October 2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23911884
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Shadow AI. When Users Move Faster Than the Institution

Wilhelm Haverkamp
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
preprint

Shadow AI. When Users Move Faster Than the Institution

Wilhelm Haverkamp
preprint en

Abstract

Physicians increasingly use generative AI without institutional approval. This essay interprets such shadow AI less as individual misconduct than as the result of an unusually large speed gap between technological adoption and institutional integration, that is, a reversal of the direction of diffusion from user to institution. Besides time pressure, the pull of the technology itself is discussed as an explanation. A blanket ban without an alternative may push use into areas that are hard to control; this relationship is a hypothesis. Data risk, decision risk and epistemic risk are distinguished. The institutional answer proposed is an internal alternative, visibility and competence, with the caveat that visibility is not yet control. The essay draws on surveys, peer-reviewed studies and regulatory sources up to October 2026.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon