Measuring Structural Intersectionality Through State Policy Contexts: Development of a Policy-Based State Discrimination (PBSD) Measure

Few existing measures of structural discrimination consider the synergistic effects of racism, sexism, and classism on health inequities. Using intersectionality as an analytical tool, we developed a policy-based state discrimination measure. From an initial pool of 235 policies, we selected 87 thematically relevant policies across various domains as potential indicators of intersectional structural discrimination. We conducted a series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to evaluate the relationship between our policy domains and the underlying latent constructs of racism, sexism, and classism. We identified two models to quantify intersectional state-level discrimination. A 3-factor model for racism, sexism, and classism included 9 policy domains and showed good fit (RMSEA: 0.026; CFI: 0.989; TLI: 0.983). A unidimensional model for intersectional discrimination also included 9 policy domains and showed good fit (RMSEA: 0.014; CFI: 0.996; TLI: 0.995). Top policy drivers of intersectional structural discrimination were domains related to the social safety net, criminal justice, and sexual and reproductive health. This measure of state-level structural discrimination advances our understanding of the intersecting effects of structural racism, sexism, and classism on health inequities by quantifying the combined effects of multiple policies and can be used to account for the policy context of each state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Societies
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16110370
Primary Topic
Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Structural Intersectionality Through State Policy Contexts: Development of a Policy-Based State Discrimination (PBSD) Measure

Bryan M. Lau, Sara Daniel, Rashelle J. Musci, Lorraine Tiera Dean et al.
Societies
Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
article

Measuring Structural Intersectionality Through State Policy Contexts: Development of a Policy-Based State Discrimination (PBSD) Measure

Bryan M. Lau, Sara Daniel, Rashelle J. Musci, Lorraine Tiera Dean, Alden Gross
article en

Abstract

Few existing measures of structural discrimination consider the synergistic effects of racism, sexism, and classism on health inequities. Using intersectionality as an analytical tool, we developed a policy-based state discrimination measure. From an initial pool of 235 policies, we selected 87 thematically relevant policies across various domains as potential indicators of intersectional structural discrimination. We conducted a series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to evaluate the relationship between our policy domains and the underlying latent constructs of racism, sexism, and classism. We identified two models to quantify intersectional state-level discrimination. A 3-factor model for racism, sexism, and classism included 9 policy domains and showed good fit (RMSEA: 0.026; CFI: 0.989; TLI: 0.983). A unidimensional model for intersectional discrimination also included 9 policy domains and showed good fit (RMSEA: 0.014; CFI: 0.996; TLI: 0.995). Top policy drivers of intersectional structural discrimination were domains related to the social safety net, criminal justice, and sexual and reproductive health. This measure of state-level structural discrimination advances our understanding of the intersecting effects of structural racism, sexism, and classism on health inequities by quantifying the combined effects of multiple policies and can be used to account for the policy context of each state.

SocietiesVol. 16(11)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Measuring Structural Intersectionality Through State Policy Contexts: Development of a Policy-Based State Discrimination (PBSD) Measure — Bryan M. Lau, Sara Daniel, et al. · Societies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS