Modeling the Transmission Dynamics of Soluble and Insoluble Water Pollutants: A Comparative Study of Random Projection and Deep Neural Networks

Water pollution remains a major environmental and public-health problem, especially in developing countries with limited treatment infrastructure. We formulate a four-compartment model of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for the transmission of soluble and insoluble water pollutants that extends an earlier model with a natural dilution rate. We prove positivity and boundedness of solutions, derive the basic reproduction number R0 and the equilibria, and show that the pollutant-free equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable when R0<1. The model is solved with two complementary neural-network strategies: an adaptive physics-informed random projection neural network (RPNN), in which Gaussian hidden-layer parameters are drawn at random and fixed and only the output weights are computed by Newton iterations without any training data, and a deep neural network (DNN) surrogate with tanh hidden layers trained by the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm on reference trajectories. Both are compared with the MATLAB solvers ode15s, ode23t, ode23s and ode45. For four case studies at a relative tolerance of 10−6, the RPNN attained L2 errors of 3.35×10−8–2.44×10−7, compared with 7.23×10−5–1.57×10−4 (ode15s), 6.12×10−4–6.50×10−4 (ode23t), 6.28×10−4–9.64×10−4 (ode23s), 8.64×10−6–1.22×10−5 (ode45) and 3.03×10−3–1.04×10−2 (DNN). This accuracy comes at a higher cost per run: the RPNN required 5.2–10.1 times the CPU time of ode15s and 4.0–21.3 times that of ode45, and a work–precision analysis shows that the explicit solver ode45 remains the most efficient solver for this small system. The accuracy of the RPNN was maintained over 200 parameter sets sampled within ±25% of the baseline, and the DNN recovered the dynamics from training data with up to 10% noise. Sensitivity analysis identifies the natural removal rate, the treatment rate of soluble pollutants and the pollutant inflow as the parameters that control R0. The RPNN is an accurate, data-free and tolerance-controlled solver for stiff environmental ODE models, whereas the DNN is a fast but less accurate surrogate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14214009
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the Transmission Dynamics of Soluble and Insoluble Water Pollutants: A Comparative Study of Random Projection and Deep Neural Networks

Anwarud Din, Waseem Waseem, Khurshaid Anwar, Ziyad A. Alhussain
Mathematics
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Modeling the Transmission Dynamics of Soluble and Insoluble Water Pollutants: A Comparative Study of Random Projection and Deep Neural Networks

Anwarud Din, Waseem Waseem, Khurshaid Anwar, Ziyad A. Alhussain
article en

Abstract

Water pollution remains a major environmental and public-health problem, especially in developing countries with limited treatment infrastructure. We formulate a four-compartment model of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for the transmission of soluble and insoluble water pollutants that extends an earlier model with a natural dilution rate. We prove positivity and boundedness of solutions, derive the basic reproduction number R0 and the equilibria, and show that the pollutant-free equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable when R0<1. The model is solved with two complementary neural-network strategies: an adaptive physics-informed random projection neural network (RPNN), in which Gaussian hidden-layer parameters are drawn at random and fixed and only the output weights are computed by Newton iterations without any training data, and a deep neural network (DNN) surrogate with tanh hidden layers trained by the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm on reference trajectories. Both are compared with the MATLAB solvers ode15s, ode23t, ode23s and ode45. For four case studies at a relative tolerance of 10−6, the RPNN attained L2 errors of 3.35×10−8–2.44×10−7, compared with 7.23×10−5–1.57×10−4 (ode15s), 6.12×10−4–6.50×10−4 (ode23t), 6.28×10−4–9.64×10−4 (ode23s), 8.64×10−6–1.22×10−5 (ode45) and 3.03×10−3–1.04×10−2 (DNN). This accuracy comes at a higher cost per run: the RPNN required 5.2–10.1 times the CPU time of ode15s and 4.0–21.3 times that of ode45, and a work–precision analysis shows that the explicit solver ode45 remains the most efficient solver for this small system. The accuracy of the RPNN was maintained over 200 parameter sets sampled within ±25% of the baseline, and the DNN recovered the dynamics from training data with up to 10% noise. Sensitivity analysis identifies the natural removal rate, the treatment rate of soluble pollutants and the pollutant inflow as the parameters that control R0. The RPNN is an accurate, data-free and tolerance-controlled solver for stiff environmental ODE models, whereas the DNN is a fast but less accurate surrogate.

MathematicsVol. 14(21)
Jiangsu University (CN), Qassim University (SA), Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (PK), Chengdu University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon