Society in the Governance of Fourth-Generation Science and Technology Parks: Evidence from Latin America

Abstract This study investigates societal participation in the governance of fourth-generation science and technology parks (STPs), focusing on how society is represented, where its presence manifests itself, which actors it interacts with, and how the quality of this participation is characterized. Methodologically, it adopts a qualitative multiple-case approach in which secondary data are used to map fourth-generation STPs in Latin America and identify analytically relevant cases, while primary data support an in-depth and contextually grounded analysis of the selected cases, HIDS—International Hub for Sustainable Development and distritotec. The analysis examines societal participation at the institutional, processual, and actions-and-outcomes levels, considering the economic, sociocultural, environmental, and knowledge dimensions. The findings show that, among the 91 STP cases mapped in Latin America, only five approximate the fourth-generation conception and, even among these, none presents society across all levels of governance. The in-depth analysis of HIDS and distritotec identified local citizens, non-governmental organizations, and the creative class as the main representations of society. However, this presence does not occur across all STP dimensions and is broader in distritotec than in HIDS. Interactions occur mainly with universities and governments, while relations with firms remain limited. In terms of quality, participation is predominantly characterized as consultation, with occasional instances of limited participation and co-creation in distritotec. Thus, the results challenge normative interpretations that assume the incorporation of society to be sufficient without problematizing its conceptual foundations and operationalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Society
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-026-01302-0
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Society in the Governance of Fourth-Generation Science and Technology Parks: Evidence from Latin America

Milena Pavan Serafim, Silvia Regina Stuchi Cruz, Guilherme Atanazildo Leme, Rafael Dias et al.
Society
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
article

Society in the Governance of Fourth-Generation Science and Technology Parks: Evidence from Latin America

Milena Pavan Serafim, Silvia Regina Stuchi Cruz, Guilherme Atanazildo Leme, Rafael Dias, Denis dos Santos Alves
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates societal participation in the governance of fourth-generation science and technology parks (STPs), focusing on how society is represented, where its presence manifests itself, which actors it interacts with, and how the quality of this participation is characterized. Methodologically, it adopts a qualitative multiple-case approach in which secondary data are used to map fourth-generation STPs in Latin America and identify analytically relevant cases, while primary data support an in-depth and contextually grounded analysis of the selected cases, HIDS—International Hub for Sustainable Development and distritotec. The analysis examines societal participation at the institutional, processual, and actions-and-outcomes levels, considering the economic, sociocultural, environmental, and knowledge dimensions. The findings show that, among the 91 STP cases mapped in Latin America, only five approximate the fourth-generation conception and, even among these, none presents society across all levels of governance. The in-depth analysis of HIDS and distritotec identified local citizens, non-governmental organizations, and the creative class as the main representations of society. However, this presence does not occur across all STP dimensions and is broader in distritotec than in HIDS. Interactions occur mainly with universities and governments, while relations with firms remain limited. In terms of quality, participation is predominantly characterized as consultation, with occasional instances of limited participation and co-creation in distritotec. Thus, the results challenge normative interpretations that assume the incorporation of society to be sufficient without problematizing its conceptual foundations and operationalization.

Society
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon