Estimating Lithium-Ion Battery Capacity from Charging-Curve Health Indicators: How Far Does It Generalise to an Unseen Cell?

Accurate battery capacity estimation is important for evaluating the health of lithium-ion batteries. However, a complete discharge test is difficult to perform when a battery is already installed in a vehicle. This study investigates whether battery capacity can be estimated from health indicators extracted from a single charging curve and whether the prediction can generalise to an unseen cell. The NASA ageing data from four 18650 lithium-ion battery cells were used. After charge-discharge pairing and data cleaning, 628 charging samples were retained. Ten health indicators were extracted and divided into time, voltage and temperature groups. Linear Regression, Random Forest and Gradient Boosting were evaluated using a pooled random split and leave-one-cell-out validation. Under the pooled random split, Random Forest with all features achieved the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0119 Ah. However, the tree models showed clear performance reductions under leave-one-cell-out validation. Linear Regression with time and voltage features achieved the best cross-cell result, with an MAE of 0.0329 Ah and an R² of 0.9446. Adding voltage features reduced the cross-cell MAE by 38.6% compared with using time features alone, while temperature features did not provide a further improvement. B0006 was the most difficult cell to predict. The results show that charging-curve indicators can estimate battery capacity effectively, but random splitting may overestimate the generalisation ability of complex models. Testing on unseen cells is therefore necessary before practical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Natural Science
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/2026.pu38480
Primary Topic
Battery Modeling and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Lithium-Ion Battery Capacity from Charging-Curve Health Indicators: How Far Does It Generalise to an Unseen Cell?

Tianxun Wu
Theoretical and Natural Science
Battery Modeling and Management
article

Estimating Lithium-Ion Battery Capacity from Charging-Curve Health Indicators: How Far Does It Generalise to an Unseen Cell?

Tianxun Wu
article en

Abstract

Accurate battery capacity estimation is important for evaluating the health of lithium-ion batteries. However, a complete discharge test is difficult to perform when a battery is already installed in a vehicle. This study investigates whether battery capacity can be estimated from health indicators extracted from a single charging curve and whether the prediction can generalise to an unseen cell. The NASA ageing data from four 18650 lithium-ion battery cells were used. After charge-discharge pairing and data cleaning, 628 charging samples were retained. Ten health indicators were extracted and divided into time, voltage and temperature groups. Linear Regression, Random Forest and Gradient Boosting were evaluated using a pooled random split and leave-one-cell-out validation. Under the pooled random split, Random Forest with all features achieved the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0119 Ah. However, the tree models showed clear performance reductions under leave-one-cell-out validation. Linear Regression with time and voltage features achieved the best cross-cell result, with an MAE of 0.0329 Ah and an R² of 0.9446. Adding voltage features reduced the cross-cell MAE by 38.6% compared with using time features alone, while temperature features did not provide a further improvement. B0006 was the most difficult cell to predict. The results show that charging-curve indicators can estimate battery capacity effectively, but random splitting may overestimate the generalisation ability of complex models. Testing on unseen cells is therefore necessary before practical application.

Theoretical and Natural ScienceVol. 196(1)
University of Leeds (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Battery Modeling and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon