Entre la norma y el dolor: la(in)visibilización jurídica delas víctimas de tortura en laslegislaciones latinoamericanas(México, Argentina y Brasil)

This study conducts a comparative analysis of the legislation of three Latin American countries on the protection of victims of torture. Through documentary analysis, the study examines the legal frameworks of Mexico, Argentina, and Brazil to identify the presence or absence of legal provisions guaranteeing reparation, protection, and rehabilitation for victims of torture. One of key findings concerns Mexico, whose legislation includes a dedicated chapter on victims of torture. In the other countries examined, victims of torture remain largely invisible in law. The absence of a victim-centered approach to this form of violence undermines not only the effectiveness of torture prevention but also the institutional recognition of the extreme suffering caused by this practice. The article underscores the need for legislative reforms and public policies that position victims of torture as a central component in efforts to combat torture, recognizing their pain as an essential dimension of justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dehuidela/Revista latinoamericana de derechos humanos/Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos (San José)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.37-2.11
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entre la norma y el dolor: la(in)visibilización jurídica delas víctimas de tortura en laslegislaciones latinoamericanas(México, Argentina y Brasil)

Maria Gorete Marques de Jesus, Ionara dos Santos Fernandes, Fábio do Nascimento Simas
Dehuidela/Revista latinoamericana de derechos humanos/Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos (San José)
Torture, Ethics, and Law
article

Entre la norma y el dolor: la(in)visibilización jurídica delas víctimas de tortura en laslegislaciones latinoamericanas(México, Argentina y Brasil)

Maria Gorete Marques de Jesus, Ionara dos Santos Fernandes, Fábio do Nascimento Simas
article en

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of the legislation of three Latin American countries on the protection of victims of torture. Through documentary analysis, the study examines the legal frameworks of Mexico, Argentina, and Brazil to identify the presence or absence of legal provisions guaranteeing reparation, protection, and rehabilitation for victims of torture. One of key findings concerns Mexico, whose legislation includes a dedicated chapter on victims of torture. In the other countries examined, victims of torture remain largely invisible in law. The absence of a victim-centered approach to this form of violence undermines not only the effectiveness of torture prevention but also the institutional recognition of the extreme suffering caused by this practice. The article underscores the need for legislative reforms and public policies that position victims of torture as a central component in efforts to combat torture, recognizing their pain as an essential dimension of justice.

Dehuidela/Revista latinoamericana de derechos humanos/Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos (San José)Vol. 37(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon