Performance of Children's Sleep Disturbance Scale for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate

ObjectiveTo evaluate associations between Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) findings and polysomnographic parameters and the diagnostic performance of its Sleep Breathing Disorders (SBD) and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (EDS) subscales for identifying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children with non-syndromic cleft conditions.DesignProspective, analytical, cross-sectional diagnostic study.SettingTertiary craniofacial referral center.Patients, ParticipantsChildren aged 3 years 8 months to 13 years with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate or isolated cleft palate. Forty-two underwent polysomnography; 38 had valid recordings and 37 had complete paired questionnaire and polysomnographic data.Main Outcome Measure(s)Associations between SDSC scores and polysomnographic parameters; sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of the SBD and EDS subscales for identifying PSG-defined OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥1 event/h).ResultsOSA was identified in 27 of 38 participants (71.1%) with valid recordings and was predominantly mild. SDSC total and subscale scores were not significantly correlated with polysomnographic parameters. The SBD subscale had sensitivity of 38.5% and specificity of 72.7%; the EDS subscale had sensitivity of 23.1% and specificity of 54.5%.ConclusionsSDSC findings showed limited agreement with polysomnography, and the SBD and EDS subscales could not reliably identify or exclude OSA. The SDSC may complement clinical assessment by characterizing caregiver-reported symptoms, but polysomnography remains necessary for objective diagnosis and severity classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261501245
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Children's Sleep Disturbance Scale for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate

Sérgio Henrique Kiemle Trindade, Ivy Kiemle Trindade‐Suedam, Letícia Vieira Crispim, Carmem Lúcia Lima et al.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

Performance of Children's Sleep Disturbance Scale for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate

Sérgio Henrique Kiemle Trindade, Ivy Kiemle Trindade‐Suedam, Letícia Vieira Crispim, Carmem Lúcia Lima, Sarah Spilari, Stefany Natália Toledo Vezaro, Daniel de Cazeto Lopes, Ana Beatriz Sintoni
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate associations between Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) findings and polysomnographic parameters and the diagnostic performance of its Sleep Breathing Disorders (SBD) and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (EDS) subscales for identifying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children with non-syndromic cleft conditions.DesignProspective, analytical, cross-sectional diagnostic study.SettingTertiary craniofacial referral center.Patients, ParticipantsChildren aged 3 years 8 months to 13 years with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate or isolated cleft palate. Forty-two underwent polysomnography; 38 had valid recordings and 37 had complete paired questionnaire and polysomnographic data.Main Outcome Measure(s)Associations between SDSC scores and polysomnographic parameters; sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of the SBD and EDS subscales for identifying PSG-defined OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥1 event/h).ResultsOSA was identified in 27 of 38 participants (71.1%) with valid recordings and was predominantly mild. SDSC total and subscale scores were not significantly correlated with polysomnographic parameters. The SBD subscale had sensitivity of 38.5% and specificity of 72.7%; the EDS subscale had sensitivity of 23.1% and specificity of 54.5%.ConclusionsSDSC findings showed limited agreement with polysomnography, and the SBD and EDS subscales could not reliably identify or exclude OSA. The SDSC may complement clinical assessment by characterizing caregiver-reported symptoms, but polysomnography remains necessary for objective diagnosis and severity classification.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon