Ramsey Numbers of Sparse Graphs Versus Complete Graphs

A graph \( G \) is Ramsey size-linear if \( R(G,H)=O(e(H)) \) for every graph \( H \) without isolated vertices. Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp asked whether every graph in which each \( j \)-vertex subgraph spans at most \( 2j-3 \) edges is Ramsey size-linear (Erdős Problem \#566); for such \( G \) this predicts \( R(G,K_n)=O(n^2) \). The open cases on at most eight vertices reduce to \( 49 \) minimal graphs. All have treewidth three, so \( R(G,K_n)=O(n^3) \) by a result of Bradač, Gishboliner and Sudakov; only two had a better bound. We improve the bound for \( 25 \) further graphs, down to \( O(n^{7/3}/\log^{4/3}n) \) for four of them. For the graph\( J \) obtained from \( K_4 \) by subdividing one edge twice and gluing a triangle to each end edge of the subdivision path, we prove \( R(J,K_n)=O(n^{5/2}/\log^2n) \), by showing that second neighbourhoods inside the links of a \( J \)-free graph are independent sets. More generally, if \( G \) is built from a wheel \( W_k \) by gluing triangles on robust edges, the robust links of a \( G \)-free graph contain no \( k \)-cycle, which bounds degrees by \( R(C_k,K_n) \). We tabulate the best known bounds against \( K_n \) and \( K_{n,n} \)for all \( 49 \) graphs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202611.0216.v1
Primary Topic
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Ramsey Numbers of Sparse Graphs Versus Complete Graphs

Gonzalo Barría
Preprints.org
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
preprint

Ramsey Numbers of Sparse Graphs Versus Complete Graphs

Gonzalo Barría
preprint en

Abstract

A graph \( G \) is Ramsey size-linear if \( R(G,H)=O(e(H)) \) for every graph \( H \) without isolated vertices. Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp asked whether every graph in which each \( j \)-vertex subgraph spans at most \( 2j-3 \) edges is Ramsey size-linear (Erdős Problem \#566); for such \( G \) this predicts \( R(G,K_n)=O(n^2) \). The open cases on at most eight vertices reduce to \( 49 \) minimal graphs. All have treewidth three, so \( R(G,K_n)=O(n^3) \) by a result of Bradač, Gishboliner and Sudakov; only two had a better bound. We improve the bound for \( 25 \) further graphs, down to \( O(n^{7/3}/\log^{4/3}n) \) for four of them. For the graph\( J \) obtained from \( K_4 \) by subdividing one edge twice and gluing a triangle to each end edge of the subdivision path, we prove \( R(J,K_n)=O(n^{5/2}/\log^2n) \), by showing that second neighbourhoods inside the links of a \( J \)-free graph are independent sets. More generally, if \( G \) is built from a wheel \( W_k \) by gluing triangles on robust edges, the robust links of a \( G \)-free graph contain no \( k \)-cycle, which bounds degrees by \( R(C_k,K_n) \). We tabulate the best known bounds against \( K_n \) and \( K_{n,n} \)for all \( 49 \) graphs.

Preprints.org
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon