Participant Overlap and Apparent Accuracy in Behavioral Depression Classification

Abstract Background Behavioral machine-learning studies can include several observations from each participant. When observations from the same person appear in both training and evaluation data, a classifier may recognize participant-specific characteristics instead of learning relationships that generalize to new people. Objective To quantify how participant overlap affects apparent classification accuracy under controlled conditions with and without a class-related signal. Methods Six simulation scenarios combined three levels of participant-specific variation with two levels of class-related signal. Each scenario contained 100 Monte Carlo replicates, each comprising 60 simulated participants, 10 observations per participant, and 10 features. A one-nearest-neighbor classifier was evaluated using five-fold record-wise and participant-wise cross-validation. Both approaches used 480 training observations and 120 evaluation observations per fold. Outcomes were pooled out-of-fold accuracy, the paired accuracy difference between evaluation approaches, and the frequency with which the record-wise classifier selected a neighbor from the same participant. Results Without class-related signal, increasing participant-specific variation raised mean record-wise accuracy from 49.88% to 94.81%. Corresponding participant-wise accuracy ranged from 49.90% to 51.27%. At the strongest participant-specific variation, the mean accuracy difference was 43.54 percentage points, with a Monte Carlo standard error of 0.41 percentage points. In that scenario, 89.81% of selected neighbors belonged to the same participant as the evaluated observation. Conclusions Under the simulated conditions, high record-wise accuracy occurred without a generalizable class-related signal. Evaluation intended to estimate performance in previously unseen people should preserve participant separation. These findings demonstrate an evaluation mechanism and do not establish depression-detection performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11592916/v1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Participant Overlap and Apparent Accuracy in Behavioral Depression Classification

Sofia Moretti
Research Square
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
preprint

Participant Overlap and Apparent Accuracy in Behavioral Depression Classification

Sofia Moretti
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background Behavioral machine-learning studies can include several observations from each participant. When observations from the same person appear in both training and evaluation data, a classifier may recognize participant-specific characteristics instead of learning relationships that generalize to new people. Objective To quantify how participant overlap affects apparent classification accuracy under controlled conditions with and without a class-related signal. Methods Six simulation scenarios combined three levels of participant-specific variation with two levels of class-related signal. Each scenario contained 100 Monte Carlo replicates, each comprising 60 simulated participants, 10 observations per participant, and 10 features. A one-nearest-neighbor classifier was evaluated using five-fold record-wise and participant-wise cross-validation. Both approaches used 480 training observations and 120 evaluation observations per fold. Outcomes were pooled out-of-fold accuracy, the paired accuracy difference between evaluation approaches, and the frequency with which the record-wise classifier selected a neighbor from the same participant. Results Without class-related signal, increasing participant-specific variation raised mean record-wise accuracy from 49.88% to 94.81%. Corresponding participant-wise accuracy ranged from 49.90% to 51.27%. At the strongest participant-specific variation, the mean accuracy difference was 43.54 percentage points, with a Monte Carlo standard error of 0.41 percentage points. In that scenario, 89.81% of selected neighbors belonged to the same participant as the evaluated observation. Conclusions Under the simulated conditions, high record-wise accuracy occurred without a generalizable class-related signal. Evaluation intended to estimate performance in previously unseen people should preserve participant separation. These findings demonstrate an evaluation mechanism and do not establish depression-detection performance.

Research Square
University of Bologna (IT)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Participant Overlap and Apparent Accuracy in Behavioral Depression Classification — Sofia Moretti · Research Square (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS