Death, Self-Existence and Personal Identity in Contemporary Art: The Limitations of Portraiture in Representing the Unity of Identity and the Specificity of Self-Portraiture

This paper examines whether a portrait can capture the identity of an individual, specifically whether a portrait captures a person’s external appearance or the diachronic continuity of their identity. The paper begins by tracing the development of theories of identity in philosophy, from the view that identity is an inherent quality waiting to be discovered, through skepticism regarding a stable self, to the concept of generative identity. Building on this foundation, the paper reconsiders the relationship between identity and the portrait, and further discusses the distinctions between portraits, self-portraits and selfies, specifically their differing roles in the construction of identity. This paper argues that identity is not a fixed object that can be fully reproduced. Consequently, a portrait cannot capture a person’s complete identity. However, the function of a portrait extends beyond mere documentation, on the contrary it involves the subject’s ongoing participation in the construction and negotiation of identity as time progresses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Humanities Research
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2026.38597
Primary Topic
Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Death, Self-Existence and Personal Identity in Contemporary Art: The Limitations of Portraiture in Representing the Unity of Identity and the Specificity of Self-Portraiture

Sipan Zhao
Communications in Humanities Research
Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
article

Death, Self-Existence and Personal Identity in Contemporary Art: The Limitations of Portraiture in Representing the Unity of Identity and the Specificity of Self-Portraiture

Sipan Zhao
article en

Abstract

This paper examines whether a portrait can capture the identity of an individual, specifically whether a portrait captures a person’s external appearance or the diachronic continuity of their identity. The paper begins by tracing the development of theories of identity in philosophy, from the view that identity is an inherent quality waiting to be discovered, through skepticism regarding a stable self, to the concept of generative identity. Building on this foundation, the paper reconsiders the relationship between identity and the portrait, and further discusses the distinctions between portraits, self-portraits and selfies, specifically their differing roles in the construction of identity. This paper argues that identity is not a fixed object that can be fully reproduced. Consequently, a portrait cannot capture a person’s complete identity. However, the function of a portrait extends beyond mere documentation, on the contrary it involves the subject’s ongoing participation in the construction and negotiation of identity as time progresses.

Communications in Humanities ResearchVol. 125(1)
University of the Arts London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon