Selective high-throughput digitization of large library collections

Large-scale digitization of library collections presents a dilemma: planetary scanning leaves the book undamaged, yet it remains slow and inefficient when millions of items must be processed. The authors examine an alternative approach — selective high-throughput digitization, in which a duplicate copy is selected, its spine is removed, and the resulting sheets are processed on a high-performance sheet-fed scanner. The authors compare this approach with traditional page-by-page scanning and show under what conditions disbinding a copy is justified and when it is inadmissible. Modelling shows that for a collection of one million volumes the imagecapture stage can be reduced from approximately 21 years to between one year and seven months, depending on scanner class — a 21- to 35-fold gain. The study also focuses on item-level accounting and the coordination of digitization. When several libraries independently digitize the same titles, duplicate digital copies are produced. The National Electronic Library (NEL), operating as a federal state information system, already provides for the storage of digital copies and maintains the union electronic catalogue of Russian library collections. However, like other union catalogues, it offers record-level bibliographic control, whereas selective highthroughput digitization requires data on the physical condition of an individual item and its duplicate status. The authors therefore propose not a new national system, but an item-level accounting and digitization coordination subsystem within the existing NEL infrastructure. Its tasks would include identifying duplicate editions, providing end-to-end identification through universal classifiers and identifiers, recording already digitized copies together with their location data, and, on this basis, compiling the array of publications for industrial-scale scanning. The authors also review international experience, from the China Academic Digital Associative Library and Digital Library of India projects to the class action brought by a group of American authors against Anthropic (Bartz et al. v. Anthropic PBC), in which the court distinguished between converting books into digital form by high-throughput digitization and using them to train artificial intelligence language models. In the light of Federal Law No. 243-FZ of 26 July 2026 "On Supporting the Development of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Russian Federation", the authors show how large-scale high-throughput digitization may become a source of data for training domestic AI models without prejudice to the interests of rightsholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific and Technical Libraries
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2026-9-43-69
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selective high-throughput digitization of large library collections

Natalia Alekseevna Mikhalchenkova, I. V. Morozov
Scientific and Technical Libraries
Library Science and Information
article

Selective high-throughput digitization of large library collections

Natalia Alekseevna Mikhalchenkova, I. V. Morozov
article en

Abstract

Large-scale digitization of library collections presents a dilemma: planetary scanning leaves the book undamaged, yet it remains slow and inefficient when millions of items must be processed. The authors examine an alternative approach — selective high-throughput digitization, in which a duplicate copy is selected, its spine is removed, and the resulting sheets are processed on a high-performance sheet-fed scanner. The authors compare this approach with traditional page-by-page scanning and show under what conditions disbinding a copy is justified and when it is inadmissible. Modelling shows that for a collection of one million volumes the imagecapture stage can be reduced from approximately 21 years to between one year and seven months, depending on scanner class — a 21- to 35-fold gain. The study also focuses on item-level accounting and the coordination of digitization. When several libraries independently digitize the same titles, duplicate digital copies are produced. The National Electronic Library (NEL), operating as a federal state information system, already provides for the storage of digital copies and maintains the union electronic catalogue of Russian library collections. However, like other union catalogues, it offers record-level bibliographic control, whereas selective highthroughput digitization requires data on the physical condition of an individual item and its duplicate status. The authors therefore propose not a new national system, but an item-level accounting and digitization coordination subsystem within the existing NEL infrastructure. Its tasks would include identifying duplicate editions, providing end-to-end identification through universal classifiers and identifiers, recording already digitized copies together with their location data, and, on this basis, compiling the array of publications for industrial-scale scanning. The authors also review international experience, from the China Academic Digital Associative Library and Digital Library of India projects to the class action brought by a group of American authors against Anthropic (Bartz et al. v. Anthropic PBC), in which the court distinguished between converting books into digital form by high-throughput digitization and using them to train artificial intelligence language models. In the light of Federal Law No. 243-FZ of 26 July 2026 "On Supporting the Development of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Russian Federation", the authors show how large-scale high-throughput digitization may become a source of data for training domestic AI models without prejudice to the interests of rightsholders.

Scientific and Technical LibrariesVol. 1(9)
Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Library Science and Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon