Cultivating proactive sustainability mindsets in higher education? Unmasking climate education in business schools

Purpose This study aims to examine how Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 (Climate Action) is integrated into business education in higher education (HE) by exploring student perceptions to comprehend whether climate education is substantively implemented or symbolically presented. Design/methodology/approach Using Q-methodology, 137 business students ranked 29 statements covering curriculum content, skills development, and attitudes toward climate action. Principal component analysis identified shared viewpoints, while qualitative feedback provided depth and context. Findings Tensions between sustainability objectives and disciplinary silos are highlighted by the emergence of two student archetypes: Engaged Advocates, who demand experiential pedagogies, and Pragmatic Observers, who prioritize economic outcomes. Results highlight a legitimacy gap between institutional rhetoric and meaningful curriculum integration. Research limitations/implications Findings are drawn from a single HE institution and focus solely on students, limiting generalizability. Future research should examine faculty perspectives, policy implementation and multi-institutional comparisons. Practical implications HE must integrate sustainability into research, curricula and community engagement, following 1) Systemic curriculum integration; 2) Scaling experiential/place-based learning and systemic/anticipatory skills; 3) Faculty training for climate-aligned pedagogies to prepare students to be actionable leaders. Social implications Empowering students as climate leaders can drive institutional reform, support regional sustainability agendas, and advance the welfare of society. Originality/value This research introduces a comprehensive framework that links educational theory, SDG competencies and transformative pedagogy to examine climate education through the lens of legitimacy theory. It also demonstrates the unique value of Q-methodology in capturing nuanced stakeholder perspectives in the context of HE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2025-0402
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultivating proactive sustainability mindsets in higher education? Unmasking climate education in business schools

Tariq Elrazaz, María Luisa Pajuelo, Moataz Moamen Elmassri, Ahmed H. Elsayed
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Sustainability in Higher Education
article

Cultivating proactive sustainability mindsets in higher education? Unmasking climate education in business schools

Tariq Elrazaz, María Luisa Pajuelo, Moataz Moamen Elmassri, Ahmed H. Elsayed
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 (Climate Action) is integrated into business education in higher education (HE) by exploring student perceptions to comprehend whether climate education is substantively implemented or symbolically presented. Design/methodology/approach Using Q-methodology, 137 business students ranked 29 statements covering curriculum content, skills development, and attitudes toward climate action. Principal component analysis identified shared viewpoints, while qualitative feedback provided depth and context. Findings Tensions between sustainability objectives and disciplinary silos are highlighted by the emergence of two student archetypes: Engaged Advocates, who demand experiential pedagogies, and Pragmatic Observers, who prioritize economic outcomes. Results highlight a legitimacy gap between institutional rhetoric and meaningful curriculum integration. Research limitations/implications Findings are drawn from a single HE institution and focus solely on students, limiting generalizability. Future research should examine faculty perspectives, policy implementation and multi-institutional comparisons. Practical implications HE must integrate sustainability into research, curricula and community engagement, following 1) Systemic curriculum integration; 2) Scaling experiential/place-based learning and systemic/anticipatory skills; 3) Faculty training for climate-aligned pedagogies to prepare students to be actionable leaders. Social implications Empowering students as climate leaders can drive institutional reform, support regional sustainability agendas, and advance the welfare of society. Originality/value This research introduces a comprehensive framework that links educational theory, SDG competencies and transformative pedagogy to examine climate education through the lens of legitimacy theory. It also demonstrates the unique value of Q-methodology in capturing nuanced stakeholder perspectives in the context of HE.

International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Al Ain University (AE), Zagazig University (EG), United Arab Emirates University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainability in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon