Levelling Monsters: Monopoly, Rights, and Public Authority

The Levellers have long been recognized as ardent antimonopolists, but their interpreters have yet to connect their grievances against private monopolies to the emergence of their political theory of legitimate public authority. This article argues that, by drawing from language and logic articulated in an understudied 1645 treatise, the Leveller leaders constructed their arguments for a Parliament that was authorized by and accountable to the people against the backdrop of monopolies endangering citizens’ fundamental rights. In this light, the Levellers demonstrate how objections to private monopoly power are deeply interwoven with the demand for popular legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Intellectual History
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479244326100936
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Levelling Monsters: Monopoly, Rights, and Public Authority

Kaarish Shah Maniar
Modern Intellectual History
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Levelling Monsters: Monopoly, Rights, and Public Authority

Kaarish Shah Maniar
article en

Abstract

The Levellers have long been recognized as ardent antimonopolists, but their interpreters have yet to connect their grievances against private monopolies to the emergence of their political theory of legitimate public authority. This article argues that, by drawing from language and logic articulated in an understudied 1645 treatise, the Leveller leaders constructed their arguments for a Parliament that was authorized by and accountable to the people against the backdrop of monopolies endangering citizens’ fundamental rights. In this light, the Levellers demonstrate how objections to private monopoly power are deeply interwoven with the demand for popular legitimacy.

Modern Intellectual History
Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon