Starving the Aggressor: Recent Advances in Glucose Oxidase-Loaded Nanotherapeutics for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype characterized by progression, metastasis, and treatment resistance. Although options include immune checkpoint inhibitors, PARP inhibitors for selected patients, and antibody–drug conjugates, the absence of a single widely applicable molecular target and tumor heterogeneity remain challenges. Increased glycolytic activity in some TNBC tumors provides a rationale for metabolic intervention, although glucose dependence varies among tumors. Glucose oxidase (GOx) catalyzes the oxidation of accessible glucose in the presence of molecular oxygen, generating hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and gluconic acid. Depending on nanoplatform design and enzyme localization, glucose depletion may occur in the extracellular tumor microenvironment or intracellular compartments following cellular uptake and enzyme release. However, free GOx is limited by poor physiological stability, rapid inactivation, oxygen dependence, inadequate tumor accumulation, and systemic toxicity. Nanotechnology offers strategies to improve enzyme stability and tumor-selective delivery while integrating complementary therapies. Preclinical studies have investigated GOx-loaded nanoplatforms combining metabolic starvation with chemotherapy, chemodynamic therapy, ferroptosis induction, photodynamic and photothermal therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Although these platforms demonstrate promising antitumor activity in experimental models, efficacy and proposed mechanisms vary across formulations and models. Pharmacological synergy should be claimed only when supported by quantitative analyses. Tumor heterogeneity, oxygen dependence, toxicity, manufacturing complexity, and regulatory challenges remain major translational barriers. Overall, current findings provide a strong preclinical rationale for further investigation of GOx-loaded nanotherapeutics, but do not establish clinical efficacy in human patients or permit predictions regarding future clinical adoption for TNBC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18111416
Primary Topic
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Starving the Aggressor: Recent Advances in Glucose Oxidase-Loaded Nanotherapeutics for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Nader Ibrahim Namazi
Pharmaceutics
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
article

Starving the Aggressor: Recent Advances in Glucose Oxidase-Loaded Nanotherapeutics for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Nader Ibrahim Namazi
article en

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype characterized by progression, metastasis, and treatment resistance. Although options include immune checkpoint inhibitors, PARP inhibitors for selected patients, and antibody–drug conjugates, the absence of a single widely applicable molecular target and tumor heterogeneity remain challenges. Increased glycolytic activity in some TNBC tumors provides a rationale for metabolic intervention, although glucose dependence varies among tumors. Glucose oxidase (GOx) catalyzes the oxidation of accessible glucose in the presence of molecular oxygen, generating hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and gluconic acid. Depending on nanoplatform design and enzyme localization, glucose depletion may occur in the extracellular tumor microenvironment or intracellular compartments following cellular uptake and enzyme release. However, free GOx is limited by poor physiological stability, rapid inactivation, oxygen dependence, inadequate tumor accumulation, and systemic toxicity. Nanotechnology offers strategies to improve enzyme stability and tumor-selective delivery while integrating complementary therapies. Preclinical studies have investigated GOx-loaded nanoplatforms combining metabolic starvation with chemotherapy, chemodynamic therapy, ferroptosis induction, photodynamic and photothermal therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Although these platforms demonstrate promising antitumor activity in experimental models, efficacy and proposed mechanisms vary across formulations and models. Pharmacological synergy should be claimed only when supported by quantitative analyses. Tumor heterogeneity, oxygen dependence, toxicity, manufacturing complexity, and regulatory challenges remain major translational barriers. Overall, current findings provide a strong preclinical rationale for further investigation of GOx-loaded nanotherapeutics, but do not establish clinical efficacy in human patients or permit predictions regarding future clinical adoption for TNBC.

PharmaceuticsVol. 18(11)
Taibah University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Starving the Aggressor: Recent Advances in Glucose Oxidase-Loaded Nanotherapeutics for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer — Nader Ibrahim Namazi · Pharmaceutics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS