Comparison of Erect Sitting and Supine MRI Proctography in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Defecatory Symptoms

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The optimal position for MRI proctography in women suffering from pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and defecatory symptoms remains uncertain. Typically, MRI proctography is performed in the supine position to assess for POP. Utilising an open-configuration MRI to image the pelvic floor in an erect sitting position may provide a more physiological assessment than a supine MRI for the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction. The aim was to compare the findings of MRI proctography performed in the conventional supine position compared with the erect sitting position in women with POP and defecatory symptoms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 333 women referred to a tertiary referral centre with POP and defecatory symptoms who underwent MRI proctography over a 4-year period. Of these, 144 women were imaged in the supine position and 189 women in the erect sitting position. Radiological findings of rectocele, rectal intussusception, enterocele, impaired defecation, and pelvic floor descent were compared. RESULTS: Pelvic floor descent was identified in significantly more women in the erect sitting position (37.0%) than in the supine position (12.5%; p < 0.001). Similarly, rectal intussusception during straining was detected in significantly more women imaged in the erect sitting position (49.7%) than in the supine group (33.3%; p = 0.003). Enterocele was identified more frequently in the erect sitting position group (4.8% versus 0.7%; p = 0.048). Impaired defecation was identified more frequently in the supine group (56.9% versus 45.0%; p = 0.030). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of anterior rectocele between the two groups of women. CONCLUSION: Erect sitting MRI proctography was associated with higher detection rates of pelvic floor descent, enterocele and rectal intussusception during straining. These findings suggest that patient positioning might influence the identification of certain pelvic floor abnormalities in the more physiological erect sitting position.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06930-y
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Erect Sitting and Supine MRI Proctography in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Defecatory Symptoms

Ruwan Fernando, Alka Bhide, Alex Digesu, Bernadette Lemmon et al.
International Urogynecology Journal
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Comparison of Erect Sitting and Supine MRI Proctography in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Defecatory Symptoms

Ruwan Fernando, Alka Bhide, Alex Digesu, Bernadette Lemmon, Vikram Khullar, Miriam Tadros
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The optimal position for MRI proctography in women suffering from pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and defecatory symptoms remains uncertain. Typically, MRI proctography is performed in the supine position to assess for POP. Utilising an open-configuration MRI to image the pelvic floor in an erect sitting position may provide a more physiological assessment than a supine MRI for the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction. The aim was to compare the findings of MRI proctography performed in the conventional supine position compared with the erect sitting position in women with POP and defecatory symptoms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 333 women referred to a tertiary referral centre with POP and defecatory symptoms who underwent MRI proctography over a 4-year period. Of these, 144 women were imaged in the supine position and 189 women in the erect sitting position. Radiological findings of rectocele, rectal intussusception, enterocele, impaired defecation, and pelvic floor descent were compared. RESULTS: Pelvic floor descent was identified in significantly more women in the erect sitting position (37.0%) than in the supine position (12.5%; p < 0.001). Similarly, rectal intussusception during straining was detected in significantly more women imaged in the erect sitting position (49.7%) than in the supine group (33.3%; p = 0.003). Enterocele was identified more frequently in the erect sitting position group (4.8% versus 0.7%; p = 0.048). Impaired defecation was identified more frequently in the supine group (56.9% versus 45.0%; p = 0.030). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of anterior rectocele between the two groups of women. CONCLUSION: Erect sitting MRI proctography was associated with higher detection rates of pelvic floor descent, enterocele and rectal intussusception during straining. These findings suggest that patient positioning might influence the identification of certain pelvic floor abnormalities in the more physiological erect sitting position.

International Urogynecology Journal
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), St Mary's Hospital (GB), St Mary's Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon