Environmental Costs, Carbon Emission Disclosure and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from the South African Energy Sector

The escalation of climate change and heightened environmental regulations have amplified the necessity for companies, especially those in carbon-heavy sectors, to enhance their environmental management and climate-related reporting. This study investigates the correlation between Carbon Emission Disclosure (CED), Environmental Costs (ENV-COST), and financial performance in energy-sector companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). The study uses a quantitative methodology and uses secondary data sourced from business annual reports, integrated reports, and sustainability reports. The empirical investigation relies on 219 observations of energy-sector companies listed on the JSE. Financial performance is evaluated through Return on Assets (ROA), Carbon Emission Disclosure is gauged using a disclosure index, and Environmental Costs are quantified by reported environmental expenditures. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis are utilized to investigate the correlations among the variables. The results indicate that Carbon Emission Disclosure is inversely and statistically significantly correlated with financial performance (β = −0.729; p < 0.002). Environmental costs exhibit a positive and statistically significant correlation with financial performance (β = 0.163; p < 0.002). The comprehensive regression model has statistical significance (F = 28.82; p < 0.001) and accounts for almost 37% of the variance in financial performance (R² = 0.37; adjusted R² = 0.36). The results indicate that disclosing carbon emissions could create immediate financial strains or expose environmental hazards, while environmental investments may yield operational, risk-management, and strategic advantages that enhance financial outcomes. The study enhances the field of environmental accounting by illustrating that environmental transparency and investment can yield disparate financial outcomes in a carbon-heavy developing market setting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.25096
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Costs, Carbon Emission Disclosure and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from the South African Energy Sector

Kansilembo Aliamutu, Makhathini Lungani Rudolph
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Environmental Costs, Carbon Emission Disclosure and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from the South African Energy Sector

Kansilembo Aliamutu, Makhathini Lungani Rudolph
article en

Abstract

The escalation of climate change and heightened environmental regulations have amplified the necessity for companies, especially those in carbon-heavy sectors, to enhance their environmental management and climate-related reporting. This study investigates the correlation between Carbon Emission Disclosure (CED), Environmental Costs (ENV-COST), and financial performance in energy-sector companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). The study uses a quantitative methodology and uses secondary data sourced from business annual reports, integrated reports, and sustainability reports. The empirical investigation relies on 219 observations of energy-sector companies listed on the JSE. Financial performance is evaluated through Return on Assets (ROA), Carbon Emission Disclosure is gauged using a disclosure index, and Environmental Costs are quantified by reported environmental expenditures. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis are utilized to investigate the correlations among the variables. The results indicate that Carbon Emission Disclosure is inversely and statistically significantly correlated with financial performance (β = −0.729; p < 0.002). Environmental costs exhibit a positive and statistically significant correlation with financial performance (β = 0.163; p < 0.002). The comprehensive regression model has statistical significance (F = 28.82; p < 0.001) and accounts for almost 37% of the variance in financial performance (R² = 0.37; adjusted R² = 0.36). The results indicate that disclosing carbon emissions could create immediate financial strains or expose environmental hazards, while environmental investments may yield operational, risk-management, and strategic advantages that enhance financial outcomes. The study enhances the field of environmental accounting by illustrating that environmental transparency and investment can yield disparate financial outcomes in a carbon-heavy developing market setting.

International Journal of Energy Economics and PolicyVol. 16(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Environmental Costs, Carbon Emission Disclosure and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from the South African Energy Sector — Kansilembo Aliamutu, Makhathini Lungani Rudolph · International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS