Comparative evaluation of herbal tea, syrup and kombucha prepared from purple corn (Zea mays L.) cob and stevia: physicochemical properties, antioxidant activity and consumer acceptability [pdf]

Background.Purple corn (Zea mays L.) cob is an anthocyanin-rich agricultural by-product that is usually discarded.Although a cob-stevia tea has previously been described, technologically different beverages made from the cob have rarely been compared.This study aimed to characterise dried purple corn cob and stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) leaves and to compare a herbal tea, syrup and kombucha prepared from the cob in terms of their physicochemical properties, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity and consumer acceptability.Materials and methods.Moisture, water extract, ash fractions, and crude fibre contents of the dried raw materials were compared with reference limits adapted from SNI 3836:2013 and ISO 3720:2011, while classes of secondary metabolites were identified using qualitative tests.Tea bags were brewed for 3, 5, or 7 min.Sugar-free syrups sweetened with stevia leaf infusion contained 0-30% (v/v) cob infusion.A cob infusion was fermented with a symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY) for 8 days, either without a sweetener or with 10% (w/v) sucrose or a commercial stevia-based sweetener.Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC 50 ; lower values indicate higher activity) are reported as mean ± SD of triplicate determinations.Acceptability was assessed using five-point hedonic scales.Results.The values obtained for the cob batch used in the tea and syrup and for the stevia leaves were within all seven reference limits.The IC 50 of the tea decreased from 102.75 ±0.14 to 47.07 ±0.03 µg/mL as brewing time increased from 3 to 7 min, reaching a value similar to that of commercial herbal tea (47.22 ±0.04 µg/ mL).Syrup IC 50 decreased non-linearly from 186.10 ±0.21 to 70.29 ±0.03 µg/mL with increasing cob infusion, while the viscosity of cob-containing syrups decreased by 61.2-62.6%during a six-cycle stability test.The fermented beverages showed 44.6-63.0%lower IC 50 values than a separately brewed unfermented cob infusion, with the lowest IC 50 value obtained for the commercial stevia-based sweetener (64.66 ±0.24 µg/ mL).By comparison, a commercial kombucha showed approximately twice the antioxidant activity (32.82 ±0.36 µg/mL).Among the kombuchas, the beverage prepared with the commercial stevia-based sweetener had the highest acceptability (92.4%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17306/j.afs.001586
Primary Topic
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of herbal tea, syrup and kombucha prepared from purple corn (Zea mays L.) cob and stevia: physicochemical properties, antioxidant activity and consumer acceptability [pdf]

Hendri Faisal, Muhammad Fauzan Lubis, Muhammad Amin Nasution, Muhammad Andry et al.
Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
article

Comparative evaluation of herbal tea, syrup and kombucha prepared from purple corn (Zea mays L.) cob and stevia: physicochemical properties, antioxidant activity and consumer acceptability [pdf]

Hendri Faisal, Muhammad Fauzan Lubis, Muhammad Amin Nasution, Muhammad Andry, Indonesia Sumatera Utara
article en

Abstract

Background.Purple corn (Zea mays L.) cob is an anthocyanin-rich agricultural by-product that is usually discarded.Although a cob-stevia tea has previously been described, technologically different beverages made from the cob have rarely been compared.This study aimed to characterise dried purple corn cob and stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) leaves and to compare a herbal tea, syrup and kombucha prepared from the cob in terms of their physicochemical properties, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging activity and consumer acceptability.Materials and methods.Moisture, water extract, ash fractions, and crude fibre contents of the dried raw materials were compared with reference limits adapted from SNI 3836:2013 and ISO 3720:2011, while classes of secondary metabolites were identified using qualitative tests.Tea bags were brewed for 3, 5, or 7 min.Sugar-free syrups sweetened with stevia leaf infusion contained 0-30% (v/v) cob infusion.A cob infusion was fermented with a symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY) for 8 days, either without a sweetener or with 10% (w/v) sucrose or a commercial stevia-based sweetener.Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC 50 ; lower values indicate higher activity) are reported as mean ± SD of triplicate determinations.Acceptability was assessed using five-point hedonic scales.Results.The values obtained for the cob batch used in the tea and syrup and for the stevia leaves were within all seven reference limits.The IC 50 of the tea decreased from 102.75 ±0.14 to 47.07 ±0.03 µg/mL as brewing time increased from 3 to 7 min, reaching a value similar to that of commercial herbal tea (47.22 ±0.04 µg/ mL).Syrup IC 50 decreased non-linearly from 186.10 ±0.21 to 70.29 ±0.03 µg/mL with increasing cob infusion, while the viscosity of cob-containing syrups decreased by 61.2-62.6%during a six-cycle stability test.The fermented beverages showed 44.6-63.0%lower IC 50 values than a separately brewed unfermented cob infusion, with the lowest IC 50 value obtained for the commercial stevia-based sweetener (64.66 ±0.24 µg/ mL).By comparison, a commercial kombucha showed approximately twice the antioxidant activity (32.82 ±0.36 µg/mL).Among the kombuchas, the beverage prepared with the commercial stevia-based sweetener had the highest acceptability (92.4%).

Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria
Universitas Syiah Kuala (ID), Sriwijaya University (ID), Institut Kesehatan Helvetia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon