Exact Simes inequalities for two-sided Gaussian tests

The Simes test combines marginal p-values to test a global null hypothesis. Whether it controls the type I error for two-sided Gaussian tests with arbitrary covariance remains open. We prove that, for every fixed number $m$ of tests, the rejection probability does not exceed the nominal level when that level is sufficiently small. The same range of levels works for every covariance matrix. Equality holds if and only if the p-values form independent groups with identical values within each group. For $m=3$, a computer-assisted proof establishes validity at $0.05$, and an analytic argument extends it to an explicit interval around $0.05$. As the number $m$ of tests increases, we prove validity in two settings: each test statistic is correlated with at most a fixed number of others; or the statistics form independent blocks whose sizes grow sufficiently slowly, at a specified rate of order $\log\log m$. Both settings allow arbitrary correlations within these restrictions. For any fixed $0

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2611.02513
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Exact Simes inequalities for two-sided Gaussian tests

Xianyang Zhang
arXiv (Cornell University)
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
preprint

Exact Simes inequalities for two-sided Gaussian tests

Xianyang Zhang
preprint en

Abstract

The Simes test combines marginal p-values to test a global null hypothesis. Whether it controls the type I error for two-sided Gaussian tests with arbitrary covariance remains open. We prove that, for every fixed number $m$ of tests, the rejection probability does not exceed the nominal level when that level is sufficiently small. The same range of levels works for every covariance matrix. Equality holds if and only if the p-values form independent groups with identical values within each group. For $m=3$, a computer-assisted proof establishes validity at $0.05$, and an analytic argument extends it to an explicit interval around $0.05$. As the number $m$ of tests increases, we prove validity in two settings: each test statistic is correlated with at most a fixed number of others; or the statistics form independent blocks whose sizes grow sufficiently slowly, at a specified rate of order $\log\log m$. Both settings allow arbitrary correlations within these restrictions. For any fixed $0

arXiv (Cornell University)
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon