The Complexity of Generalized HyperLTL with Stuttering and Contexts

We settle the complexity of satisfiability, finite-state satisfiability, and model-checking for generalized HyperLTL with stuttering and contexts, an expressive logic for the specification of asynchronous hyperproperties. Such properties cannot be specified in HyperLTL, as it is restricted to synchronous hyperproperties. Nevertheless, we prove that satisfiability is $Σ_1^1$-complete and thus not harder than for HyperLTL. On the other hand, we prove that model-checking and finite-state satisfiability are equivalent to truth in second-order arithmetic, and thus much harder than the decidable HyperLTL model-checking problem and the $Σ_0^1$-complete HyperLTL finite-state satisfiability problem. The lower bounds for the model-checking and finite-state satisfiability problems hold even when only allowing stuttering or only allowing contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Logical Methods in Computer Science
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-22(4:13)2026
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Complexity of Generalized HyperLTL with Stuttering and Contexts

Martín Zimmermann, Gaëtan Regaud
Logical Methods in Computer Science
Formal Methods in Verification
article

The Complexity of Generalized HyperLTL with Stuttering and Contexts

Martín Zimmermann, Gaëtan Regaud
article en

Abstract

We settle the complexity of satisfiability, finite-state satisfiability, and model-checking for generalized HyperLTL with stuttering and contexts, an expressive logic for the specification of asynchronous hyperproperties. Such properties cannot be specified in HyperLTL, as it is restricted to synchronous hyperproperties. Nevertheless, we prove that satisfiability is $Σ_1^1$-complete and thus not harder than for HyperLTL. On the other hand, we prove that model-checking and finite-state satisfiability are equivalent to truth in second-order arithmetic, and thus much harder than the decidable HyperLTL model-checking problem and the $Σ_0^1$-complete HyperLTL finite-state satisfiability problem. The lower bounds for the model-checking and finite-state satisfiability problems hold even when only allowing stuttering or only allowing contexts.

Logical Methods in Computer ScienceVol. Volume 22, Issue 4
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon