Coordinating security investment in the authorized operation of public data: a tripartite evolutionary game analysis

Authorized public-data operation links source-data preparation by public-sector providers, secure product and service development by authorized operators, and security supervision by regulators. These actors face interdependent investment decisions, because the safeguards provided by one party can benefit the other while additional governance investment remains costly. This paper develops a tripartite evolutionary game in which providers choose between additional source-data governance and baseline compliance, operators choose between additional platform and downstream governance and baseline operation, and regulators choose between enhanced and routine oversight. The payoff structure integrates bidirectional free-riding, unilateral and joint investment returns, and behavior-contingent regulation, with actor-specific returns, costs, policy support, expected liabilities, accountability losses, and deterrence value represented separately. From the resulting payoff differences, the analysis derives closed-form investment and regulatory thresholds and exact local-stability conditions for the eight pure-strategy states. Coordinated investment is locally stable only when both operating parties obtain positive net returns from joint investment. One-sided return deficits therefore sustain one-sided investment outcomes even when the other party invests or enhanced oversight remains active. In the benchmark, the all-invest, enhanced-oversight state is unstable, whereas mutual investment combined with routine, risk-based oversight can be stable. Normalized numerical experiments illustrate the seven potentially stable vertex configurations under selected parameter regimes and examine initial conditions, revenue sharing, regulatory cost, and symmetric deterministic exploration. The results indicate when actor-specific incentives, joint-return allocation, and behavior-contingent accountability can sustain coordinated investment and permit a transition from enhanced intervention to routine oversight. The numerical results are presented on a dimensionless scale and support mechanism-level comparisons across threshold regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physics
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2026.1954488
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coordinating security investment in the authorized operation of public data: a tripartite evolutionary game analysis

Weili Li, Jian Yang, Chunmei Hu
Frontiers in Physics
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
article

Coordinating security investment in the authorized operation of public data: a tripartite evolutionary game analysis

Weili Li, Jian Yang, Chunmei Hu
article en

Abstract

Authorized public-data operation links source-data preparation by public-sector providers, secure product and service development by authorized operators, and security supervision by regulators. These actors face interdependent investment decisions, because the safeguards provided by one party can benefit the other while additional governance investment remains costly. This paper develops a tripartite evolutionary game in which providers choose between additional source-data governance and baseline compliance, operators choose between additional platform and downstream governance and baseline operation, and regulators choose between enhanced and routine oversight. The payoff structure integrates bidirectional free-riding, unilateral and joint investment returns, and behavior-contingent regulation, with actor-specific returns, costs, policy support, expected liabilities, accountability losses, and deterrence value represented separately. From the resulting payoff differences, the analysis derives closed-form investment and regulatory thresholds and exact local-stability conditions for the eight pure-strategy states. Coordinated investment is locally stable only when both operating parties obtain positive net returns from joint investment. One-sided return deficits therefore sustain one-sided investment outcomes even when the other party invests or enhanced oversight remains active. In the benchmark, the all-invest, enhanced-oversight state is unstable, whereas mutual investment combined with routine, risk-based oversight can be stable. Normalized numerical experiments illustrate the seven potentially stable vertex configurations under selected parameter regimes and examine initial conditions, revenue sharing, regulatory cost, and symmetric deterministic exploration. The results indicate when actor-specific incentives, joint-return allocation, and behavior-contingent accountability can sustain coordinated investment and permit a transition from enhanced intervention to routine oversight. The numerical results are presented on a dimensionless scale and support mechanism-level comparisons across threshold regions.

Frontiers in PhysicsVol. 14
Shanxi University of Finance and Economics (CN), Qufu Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon