The Limited versus Extended Trophic Feeding (LET-FEED) Trial: Study Protocol of a Multi-Center Individually Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Abstract Background : Nearly 30% of all very preterm (VP; defined as those born before 32 weeks’ gestation) newborns develop late onset sepsis (LOS), a life-threatening infection that occurs after 72 hours from birth. Early human milk feeding is associated with reduced risk of LOS. Systematic reviews have reported that the strategy of starting enteral feeds shortly after birth, with advancement in volume before four days from birth, decreases the risk of LOS. However, limited evidence exists to guide advancement before four days. Thus, clinicians are uncertain whether advancing enteral feeds at one versus three days after birth affects outcomes. Methods: This is a multi-center, open-label, parallel-group, individual randomized controlled trial comparing two different trophic feeding regimens in preterm infants born between 25 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks of gestation and with birthweights <1500 grams. Neonates will be randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) to either limited trophic feeding (20 to 25 mL/kg birthweight/day for one day) or extended trophic feeding (20 to 25 mL/kg birthweight/day for three days) prior to advancing enteral feeds until full feeding volume (≥140 mL/kg day). The primary outcome is LOS, defined as positive blood, urine, and/or cerebrospinal fluid cultures in the presence of compatible clinical signs of sepsis occurring after 72 hours from birth and before hospital discharge, and treated with antibiotics for ≥ 5 days. Secondary outcomes will include length of hospital stay, all-cause in-hospital mortality, duration of intravenous fluids and central line utilization, necrotizing enterocolitis, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or retinopathy of prematurity requiring intervention. Growth metrics will be evaluated using change in weight, length, and head circumference z-scores from birth to 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age. Discussion: The LET-FEED trial will investigate whether advancement of enteral feeds after 1 or 3 days of trophic feeds leads to improved outcomes without evidence of harm among VP newborns. As the trial is a multi-center clinical trial conducted across geographically diverse regions of the US, the findings will have external validity and generalizability to many settings, increasing the potential for directly actionable results. Trial Registration: The present study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier No: NCT06893939.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9475404/v1
Primary Topic
Infant Nutrition and Health
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Limited versus Extended Trophic Feeding (LET-FEED) Trial: Study Protocol of a Multi-Center Individually Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Erynn M. Bergner, Steven Ford, Amy B. Hair, Yo Nishihara et al.
Research Square
Infant Nutrition and Health
preprint

The Limited versus Extended Trophic Feeding (LET-FEED) Trial: Study Protocol of a Multi-Center Individually Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Erynn M. Bergner, Steven Ford, Amy B. Hair, Yo Nishihara, Gregory Charles Valentine, Katie M. Strobel, Muralidhar H. Premkumar, Ariel Salas, Robin G. LaGrandeur, Kim Deynaka, Stephen Welty
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background : Nearly 30% of all very preterm (VP; defined as those born before 32 weeks’ gestation) newborns develop late onset sepsis (LOS), a life-threatening infection that occurs after 72 hours from birth. Early human milk feeding is associated with reduced risk of LOS. Systematic reviews have reported that the strategy of starting enteral feeds shortly after birth, with advancement in volume before four days from birth, decreases the risk of LOS. However, limited evidence exists to guide advancement before four days. Thus, clinicians are uncertain whether advancing enteral feeds at one versus three days after birth affects outcomes. Methods: This is a multi-center, open-label, parallel-group, individual randomized controlled trial comparing two different trophic feeding regimens in preterm infants born between 25 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks of gestation and with birthweights <1500 grams. Neonates will be randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) to either limited trophic feeding (20 to 25 mL/kg birthweight/day for one day) or extended trophic feeding (20 to 25 mL/kg birthweight/day for three days) prior to advancing enteral feeds until full feeding volume (≥140 mL/kg day). The primary outcome is LOS, defined as positive blood, urine, and/or cerebrospinal fluid cultures in the presence of compatible clinical signs of sepsis occurring after 72 hours from birth and before hospital discharge, and treated with antibiotics for ≥ 5 days. Secondary outcomes will include length of hospital stay, all-cause in-hospital mortality, duration of intravenous fluids and central line utilization, necrotizing enterocolitis, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or retinopathy of prematurity requiring intervention. Growth metrics will be evaluated using change in weight, length, and head circumference z-scores from birth to 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age. Discussion: The LET-FEED trial will investigate whether advancement of enteral feeds after 1 or 3 days of trophic feeds leads to improved outcomes without evidence of harm among VP newborns. As the trial is a multi-center clinical trial conducted across geographically diverse regions of the US, the findings will have external validity and generalizability to many settings, increasing the potential for directly actionable results. Trial Registration: The present study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier No: NCT06893939.

Research Square
Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), University of South Florida (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), St. Joseph Medical Center in Tacoma (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Infant Nutrition and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon