Improvements in patient-reported outcomes after neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy for snoring and mild sleep apnea

Objectives: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) offers alternative options to patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) unable to tolerate first line treatment. Randomized controlled trial data suggest efficacy of NMES treatment in improving OSA outcomes, snoring and sleepiness; however, no study to our knowledge has examined the effects on a range of daytime patient reported outcomes in a large real-world sample. Methods: This report presents clinical data from 472 patients completing NMES treatment. Bayesian linear mixed models were used to analyze pre-to-post treatment changes in mood (PHQ8), sleep disturbance (PROMIS-SD-4a), sleep related impairment (PROMIS-SRI-4a), and functioning (FOSQ), whilst controlling for key covariates. Posterior probabilities were calculated to estimate the probability of a change in symptoms (P(effect > 0)) and probability of exceeding a minimal clinically important difference (P(effect > MCID)). Results: The posterior probabilities of an improvement in scores in sleep disturbance (mean change -6.1, 94% HDI: -3.8 to -8.5) and sleep-related impairment (mean change -10.0, 94% HDI: -5.4 to -14), depression (mean change -3.5, 94% HDI: -1.7 to -5.2), at posttreatment were greatest and varied between 99.8 to 100%. Probability of change in functioning was low (60.9% chance of improvement). These effects remained when controlling for age, gender, treatment adherence, mean intensity and variance in intensity. Probabilities for MCI change for mood, sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment were high (86-91%). Conclusions: The results from this report highlight the potential impact NMES therapy has on patient reported outcomes. These findings are in support of prior randomized placebo-controlled data and several observational cohort studies for NMES as treatment for mild OSA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.02.26367068
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Improvements in patient-reported outcomes after neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy for snoring and mild sleep apnea

Sairam Parthasarathy, Atul Malhotra, Alex Lee Jones, Joseph M. Ojile et al.
medRxiv
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
preprint

Improvements in patient-reported outcomes after neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy for snoring and mild sleep apnea

Sairam Parthasarathy, Atul Malhotra, Alex Lee Jones, Joseph M. Ojile, Megan Crawford, Harneet Kaur Walia, Cammie Osborne
preprint en

Abstract

Objectives: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) offers alternative options to patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) unable to tolerate first line treatment. Randomized controlled trial data suggest efficacy of NMES treatment in improving OSA outcomes, snoring and sleepiness; however, no study to our knowledge has examined the effects on a range of daytime patient reported outcomes in a large real-world sample. Methods: This report presents clinical data from 472 patients completing NMES treatment. Bayesian linear mixed models were used to analyze pre-to-post treatment changes in mood (PHQ8), sleep disturbance (PROMIS-SD-4a), sleep related impairment (PROMIS-SRI-4a), and functioning (FOSQ), whilst controlling for key covariates. Posterior probabilities were calculated to estimate the probability of a change in symptoms (P(effect > 0)) and probability of exceeding a minimal clinically important difference (P(effect > MCID)). Results: The posterior probabilities of an improvement in scores in sleep disturbance (mean change -6.1, 94% HDI: -3.8 to -8.5) and sleep-related impairment (mean change -10.0, 94% HDI: -5.4 to -14), depression (mean change -3.5, 94% HDI: -1.7 to -5.2), at posttreatment were greatest and varied between 99.8 to 100%. Probability of change in functioning was low (60.9% chance of improvement). These effects remained when controlling for age, gender, treatment adherence, mean intensity and variance in intensity. Probabilities for MCI change for mood, sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment were high (86-91%). Conclusions: The results from this report highlight the potential impact NMES therapy has on patient reported outcomes. These findings are in support of prior randomized placebo-controlled data and several observational cohort studies for NMES as treatment for mild OSA.

medRxiv
University of Arizona (US), University of Strathclyde (GB), Baptist College of Health Sciences (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), Swansea University (GB), Brookwood Baptist Health (US), Clayton Sleep Institute (US)
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon