Patients With Critical Humeral Bone Loss Have Similar Patient‐Reported Outcomes to Patients Without Critical Humeral Bone Loss After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization at a Mean Follow‐Up of 7 Years

Purpose To compare long‐term patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) between patients with and without critical humeral bone loss (CHBL) and to compare long‐term PROs among patients with CHBL who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) alone versus those who received a remplissage augmentation (ABR + R). Methods A retrospective review included patients aged 13 to 50 years who underwent ABR or ABR + R for anterior shoulder instability from 2007 to 2023. Exclusion criteria included <1‐year follow‐up, >20% glenoid bone loss, off‐track Hill‐Sachs lesion, concomitant pathology, or revision surgery. CHBL was defined as humeral head defect extension below the 90° equator. Western Ontario Shoulder Index, pain Visual Analog Scale, and Subjective Shoulder Value were collected at the final follow‐up. PROs and recurrence rates were compared between cohorts and within the CHBL subgroup. Results Three hundred eighty‐four patients were included (mean age 23 ± 9 years (range: 13‐49), 78% men), of which 99 (26%) were successfully contacted for PROs: 129 (34%) with CHBL and 255 (66%) without CHBL. The CHBL cohort was older (25 vs 22 years, P < .01) and had smaller distance to dislocation (9 vs 13 mm, P < .01). Recurrent instability rates were comparable overall (22% vs 15%, P = .08), but, within the CHBL cohort, recurrence was significantly lower after ABR + R than ABR alone (9% vs 32%, P < .01). Ninety‐nine patients (26%) (41 CHBL, 58 non‐CHBL) completed PROs at a mean follow‐up of 7.3 years (range: 1.9‐14.4), with no significant differences in Western Ontario Shoulder Index, pain Visual Analog Scale, Subjective Shoulder Value, or recurrent instability between groups (all P > .05). In a multivariable linear regression, only recurrent instability was an independent predictor of inferior PROs; the presence of CHBL was not an independent predictor. Among CHBL patients, PROs were similar between ABR and ABR + R. Conclusions Patients with CHBL had similar long‐term PROs to those without CHBL after ABR or ABR + R at a minimum follow‐up of 1 year. Furthermore, the addition of remplissage was found to be associated with a reduced rate of recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with CHBL. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70140
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients With Critical Humeral Bone Loss Have Similar Patient‐Reported Outcomes to Patients Without Critical Humeral Bone Loss After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization at a Mean Follow‐Up of 7 Years

Ting Cong, Ryan Gilbert, Ryan T. Lin, Mark W. Rodosky et al.
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Patients With Critical Humeral Bone Loss Have Similar Patient‐Reported Outcomes to Patients Without Critical Humeral Bone Loss After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization at a Mean Follow‐Up of 7 Years

Ting Cong, Ryan Gilbert, Ryan T. Lin, Mark W. Rodosky, Adam Popchak, Jonathan Daniel Hughes, Sahil Dadoo, Andrew Liu, Albert Lin, Bryson P. Lesniak
article en

Abstract

Purpose To compare long‐term patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) between patients with and without critical humeral bone loss (CHBL) and to compare long‐term PROs among patients with CHBL who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) alone versus those who received a remplissage augmentation (ABR + R). Methods A retrospective review included patients aged 13 to 50 years who underwent ABR or ABR + R for anterior shoulder instability from 2007 to 2023. Exclusion criteria included <1‐year follow‐up, >20% glenoid bone loss, off‐track Hill‐Sachs lesion, concomitant pathology, or revision surgery. CHBL was defined as humeral head defect extension below the 90° equator. Western Ontario Shoulder Index, pain Visual Analog Scale, and Subjective Shoulder Value were collected at the final follow‐up. PROs and recurrence rates were compared between cohorts and within the CHBL subgroup. Results Three hundred eighty‐four patients were included (mean age 23 ± 9 years (range: 13‐49), 78% men), of which 99 (26%) were successfully contacted for PROs: 129 (34%) with CHBL and 255 (66%) without CHBL. The CHBL cohort was older (25 vs 22 years, P < .01) and had smaller distance to dislocation (9 vs 13 mm, P < .01). Recurrent instability rates were comparable overall (22% vs 15%, P = .08), but, within the CHBL cohort, recurrence was significantly lower after ABR + R than ABR alone (9% vs 32%, P < .01). Ninety‐nine patients (26%) (41 CHBL, 58 non‐CHBL) completed PROs at a mean follow‐up of 7.3 years (range: 1.9‐14.4), with no significant differences in Western Ontario Shoulder Index, pain Visual Analog Scale, Subjective Shoulder Value, or recurrent instability between groups (all P > .05). In a multivariable linear regression, only recurrent instability was an independent predictor of inferior PROs; the presence of CHBL was not an independent predictor. Among CHBL patients, PROs were similar between ABR and ABR + R. Conclusions Patients with CHBL had similar long‐term PROs to those without CHBL after ABR or ABR + R at a minimum follow‐up of 1 year. Furthermore, the addition of remplissage was found to be associated with a reduced rate of recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with CHBL. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Sutter Health (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon