Lumped vs Distributed Plasticity in Terms of Parameters Used in Seismic Codes and Seismic Design

A comprehensive study is performed for moment steel frames, designed according to the Mexico City Code (MCC), considering the lumped plasticity (LP) formulation and compared with that of distributed plasticity (DP). Bending moments and interstory shears are underestimated by up to 40% using the LP approach; however, axial loads in interior columns are precisely estimated. The magnitude of seismic reduction factor (Q’) values specified in the MCC are not justified. Nor is the assumption of the same reduction for all parameters. The DP formulation and the step-by-step nonlinear seismic analysis are suggested to estimate the responses of the studied structural system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2026.2734876
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lumped vs Distributed Plasticity in Terms of Parameters Used in Seismic Codes and Seismic Design

Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán, Alfredo Reyes‐Salazar, Mario D. Llanes-Tizoc, Juan Bojórquez et al.
Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Lumped vs Distributed Plasticity in Terms of Parameters Used in Seismic Codes and Seismic Design

Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán, Alfredo Reyes‐Salazar, Mario D. Llanes-Tizoc, Juan Bojórquez, Eden Bojorquez-Mora, Juan D. Trasviña-Soberanes
article en

Abstract

A comprehensive study is performed for moment steel frames, designed according to the Mexico City Code (MCC), considering the lumped plasticity (LP) formulation and compared with that of distributed plasticity (DP). Bending moments and interstory shears are underestimated by up to 40% using the LP approach; however, axial loads in interior columns are precisely estimated. The magnitude of seismic reduction factor (Q’) values specified in the MCC are not justified. Nor is the assumption of the same reduction for all parameters. The DP formulation and the step-by-step nonlinear seismic analysis are suggested to estimate the responses of the studied structural system.

Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Lumped vs Distributed Plasticity in Terms of Parameters Used in Seismic Codes and Seismic Design — Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán, Alfredo Reyes‐Salazar, et al. · Journal of Earthquake Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS