AI-accelerated compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon MRI: prospective validation of image quality and preliminary assessment of staging accuracy versus contrast-enhanced CT

Abstract Objectives To prospectively validate an AI-accelerated MRI protocol combining L₁-regularized compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon cancer staging, compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Materials and methods This single-center study (August 2022–April 2024) enrolled 132 patients with pathologically confirmed colon cancer who underwent both 3.0-T non-contrast MRI and CECT within 1 week. Patients unable to complete an MRI were excluded. MRI sequences included T1- and T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. Image quality was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, alongside quantitative analysis of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and edge rise distance (ERD). Surgical pathology correlation was available for 33 cases. Five radiologists independently reviewed the images. Results Among 153 matched examination pairs from 132 patients (mean age, 58 ± 11 years), AI-MRI outperformed CECT in both qualitative and quantitative measures. MRI yielded higher image quality scores (4 [IQR 3–4] vs. 3 [IQR 3–3]), improved CNR (5.5 [IQR 4.2–7.0] vs. 1.3 [IQR 0.7–2.2]), and reduced ERD (1.6 mm [IQR 1.2–2.8] vs. 3.7 mm [IQR 2.8–5.0]). MRI provided superior peritoneal sharpness (75.8%) and colonic wall visualization (100%), and superior or equivalent tumor conspicuity (92.2%) and nodal assessment (86.9%), whereas CECT demonstrated better artifact control (45.1%). In preliminary analyses, MRI achieved higher T-staging accuracy (78.8% vs. 30.3%) and N-staging specificity (93.3% vs. 13.3%). Conclusion The AI-accelerated MRI protocol significantly outperformed CECT in image quality and preliminary staging accuracy for colon cancer evaluation while eliminating radiation exposure. Key Points Question Can an AI-accelerated MRI protocol provide superior image quality and staging performance compared with contrast-enhanced CT, which has limited diagnostic accuracy for colon cancer staging? Findings AI-accelerated MRI using L₁-regularized compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction achieved superior image quality and higher preliminary staging accuracy than contrast-enhanced CT. Critical Relevance Statement AI-accelerated MRI improves image quality and staging confidence without radiation exposure, supporting its potential to enhance preoperative assessment and clinical decision-making in colon cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights into Imaging
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02445-8
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-accelerated compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon MRI: prospective validation of image quality and preliminary assessment of staging accuracy versus contrast-enhanced CT

Ying‐Shi Sun, Xiaoyan Zhang, Zhen Guan, Rui-Jia Sun et al.
Insights into Imaging
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

AI-accelerated compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon MRI: prospective validation of image quality and preliminary assessment of staging accuracy versus contrast-enhanced CT

Ying‐Shi Sun, Xiaoyan Zhang, Zhen Guan, Rui-Jia Sun, Jun Yang, Tian-Jing Chang, Sha Liu, Xiao Zhang, Nan Sun, Zi-Ran Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To prospectively validate an AI-accelerated MRI protocol combining L₁-regularized compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon cancer staging, compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Materials and methods This single-center study (August 2022–April 2024) enrolled 132 patients with pathologically confirmed colon cancer who underwent both 3.0-T non-contrast MRI and CECT within 1 week. Patients unable to complete an MRI were excluded. MRI sequences included T1- and T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. Image quality was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, alongside quantitative analysis of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and edge rise distance (ERD). Surgical pathology correlation was available for 33 cases. Five radiologists independently reviewed the images. Results Among 153 matched examination pairs from 132 patients (mean age, 58 ± 11 years), AI-MRI outperformed CECT in both qualitative and quantitative measures. MRI yielded higher image quality scores (4 [IQR 3–4] vs. 3 [IQR 3–3]), improved CNR (5.5 [IQR 4.2–7.0] vs. 1.3 [IQR 0.7–2.2]), and reduced ERD (1.6 mm [IQR 1.2–2.8] vs. 3.7 mm [IQR 2.8–5.0]). MRI provided superior peritoneal sharpness (75.8%) and colonic wall visualization (100%), and superior or equivalent tumor conspicuity (92.2%) and nodal assessment (86.9%), whereas CECT demonstrated better artifact control (45.1%). In preliminary analyses, MRI achieved higher T-staging accuracy (78.8% vs. 30.3%) and N-staging specificity (93.3% vs. 13.3%). Conclusion The AI-accelerated MRI protocol significantly outperformed CECT in image quality and preliminary staging accuracy for colon cancer evaluation while eliminating radiation exposure. Key Points Question Can an AI-accelerated MRI protocol provide superior image quality and staging performance compared with contrast-enhanced CT, which has limited diagnostic accuracy for colon cancer staging? Findings AI-accelerated MRI using L₁-regularized compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction achieved superior image quality and higher preliminary staging accuracy than contrast-enhanced CT. Critical Relevance Statement AI-accelerated MRI improves image quality and staging confidence without radiation exposure, supporting its potential to enhance preoperative assessment and clinical decision-making in colon cancer.

Insights into ImagingVol. 17(1)
United Imaging Healthcare (China) (CN), Peking University Shougang Hospital (CN), Ministry of Education (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon