Comparison of a touch surgery–based flipped classroom with a conventional flipped classroom on knowledge, cognitive performance, and motivation in surgical technology students: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Surgical technologists must increasingly anticipate surgeons’ needs and develop cognitive understanding of surgical procedures to support intraoperative performance. However, limited evidence exists on integrating cognitive task analysis–based simulation as a pre-class activity within flipped classroom models for surgical technology students. This study evaluated whether a Touch Surgery–based flipped classroom improves knowledge, cognitive performance, and motivation compared with a conventional flipped classroom. Methods This randomized controlled trial (pretest–posttest design) was conducted from February to May 2026 with 67 surgical technology students at Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. Participants were randomly allocated to an intervention group (Touch Surgery simulation-based flipped classroom) or a control group (flipped classroom with narrated PowerPoint materials). Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, a researcher-developed knowledge and cognitive performance test, and the Course Interest Survey (CIS). Results Both groups showed significant improvements in knowledge and cognitive performance from pre-test to post-test ( p < 0.05). While no significant between-group difference was observed in post-test knowledge scores ( p > 0.05), the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher post-test cognitive performance compared with the control group ( p < 0.05). Overall motivation did not differ significantly between the two groups ( p > 0.05); however, the intervention group showed significantly higher scores on the attention subscale ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Integrating the Touch Surgery simulation into a flipped classroom model significantly enhanced cognitive performance and self-reported attentional engagement among surgical technology students, although it did not significantly affect overall knowledge acquisition or general motivation. These findings suggest that cognitive simulation platforms offer a feasible and effective strategy for promoting procedural cognition and step-by-step learning in surgical technology curricula, with potential implications for learner-centered education in resource-limited settings. Trial registration This study was prospectively registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20220518054911N1) on 5 February 2026. The full trial details are available at: https://irct.ir/trial/88845 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10722-9
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of a touch surgery–based flipped classroom with a conventional flipped classroom on knowledge, cognitive performance, and motivation in surgical technology students: a randomized controlled trial

Reza Khorammakan, Rajab Dashti-Kalantar, Sepideh Totonchilar, Navaz Emadi
BMC Medical Education
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Comparison of a touch surgery–based flipped classroom with a conventional flipped classroom on knowledge, cognitive performance, and motivation in surgical technology students: a randomized controlled trial

Reza Khorammakan, Rajab Dashti-Kalantar, Sepideh Totonchilar, Navaz Emadi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Surgical technologists must increasingly anticipate surgeons’ needs and develop cognitive understanding of surgical procedures to support intraoperative performance. However, limited evidence exists on integrating cognitive task analysis–based simulation as a pre-class activity within flipped classroom models for surgical technology students. This study evaluated whether a Touch Surgery–based flipped classroom improves knowledge, cognitive performance, and motivation compared with a conventional flipped classroom. Methods This randomized controlled trial (pretest–posttest design) was conducted from February to May 2026 with 67 surgical technology students at Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. Participants were randomly allocated to an intervention group (Touch Surgery simulation-based flipped classroom) or a control group (flipped classroom with narrated PowerPoint materials). Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, a researcher-developed knowledge and cognitive performance test, and the Course Interest Survey (CIS). Results Both groups showed significant improvements in knowledge and cognitive performance from pre-test to post-test ( p < 0.05). While no significant between-group difference was observed in post-test knowledge scores ( p > 0.05), the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher post-test cognitive performance compared with the control group ( p < 0.05). Overall motivation did not differ significantly between the two groups ( p > 0.05); however, the intervention group showed significantly higher scores on the attention subscale ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Integrating the Touch Surgery simulation into a flipped classroom model significantly enhanced cognitive performance and self-reported attentional engagement among surgical technology students, although it did not significantly affect overall knowledge acquisition or general motivation. These findings suggest that cognitive simulation platforms offer a feasible and effective strategy for promoting procedural cognition and step-by-step learning in surgical technology curricula, with potential implications for learner-centered education in resource-limited settings. Trial registration This study was prospectively registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20220518054911N1) on 5 February 2026. The full trial details are available at: https://irct.ir/trial/88845 .

BMC Medical Education
Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (IR), Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Chabahar University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon