Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Survey of Modalities, Frameworks, and Clinical Tasks

The diagnosis of colorectal cancer encompasses nine complementary modalities: stool-based screening, blood-based biomarkers, cross-sectional imaging, endoscopic evaluation, histopathology, liquid biopsy, molecular and genetic profiling, microbiome analysis, and nanotechnology-based diagnostics. This narrative review synthesizes 160 references spanning seven task-specific artificial intelligence domains, including computer-aided detection, optical diagnosis, invasion depth prediction, computational pathology and radiogenomics, metastasis forecasting, neoadjuvant treatment response prediction, and surgical workflow analysis. We propose a conceptual multimodal pipeline comprising data ingestion, preprocessing and harmonization, feature representation, multimodal fusion, forecasting, explainability, and validation. A structured evidence grading framework classifies each clinical task by evidence level, consistency, and clinical readiness. We further catalog public datasets, challenge benchmarks, and five reporting standards: TRIPOD-AI, CONSORT-AI, SPIRIT-AI, DECIDE-AI, and CLAIM. Computer-aided detection and optical diagnosis demonstrate the highest maturity with Level 1 evidence from randomized controlled trials, while computational pathology, radiogenomics, and metastasis prediction remain at Level 2 with retrospective validation (internal or external). Microbiome screening, nanotechnology diagnostics, and surgical phase recognition are exploratory. The principal barriers to clinical adoption are domain shift, data scarcity, calibration, prospective validation, and workflow integration. We conclude that clinically useful artificial intelligence requires robust external validation, uncertainty quantification, explainable outputs, standardized reporting, and a structured translational pathway from retrospective evidence through regulatory clearance to post-deployment monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18213522
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Survey of Modalities, Frameworks, and Clinical Tasks

Mohammed Asaad Ghazal, Jawad Yousaf, Hossam Magdy Balaha, Ayman S El-Baz et al.
Cancers
AI in cancer detection
article

Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Survey of Modalities, Frameworks, and Clinical Tasks

Mohammed Asaad Ghazal, Jawad Yousaf, Hossam Magdy Balaha, Ayman S El-Baz, Dibson Dibe Gondim, Khaldon Y. Lweesy, Bassant El-Mosalamy, Sohayla El-Moursi
article en

Abstract

The diagnosis of colorectal cancer encompasses nine complementary modalities: stool-based screening, blood-based biomarkers, cross-sectional imaging, endoscopic evaluation, histopathology, liquid biopsy, molecular and genetic profiling, microbiome analysis, and nanotechnology-based diagnostics. This narrative review synthesizes 160 references spanning seven task-specific artificial intelligence domains, including computer-aided detection, optical diagnosis, invasion depth prediction, computational pathology and radiogenomics, metastasis forecasting, neoadjuvant treatment response prediction, and surgical workflow analysis. We propose a conceptual multimodal pipeline comprising data ingestion, preprocessing and harmonization, feature representation, multimodal fusion, forecasting, explainability, and validation. A structured evidence grading framework classifies each clinical task by evidence level, consistency, and clinical readiness. We further catalog public datasets, challenge benchmarks, and five reporting standards: TRIPOD-AI, CONSORT-AI, SPIRIT-AI, DECIDE-AI, and CLAIM. Computer-aided detection and optical diagnosis demonstrate the highest maturity with Level 1 evidence from randomized controlled trials, while computational pathology, radiogenomics, and metastasis prediction remain at Level 2 with retrospective validation (internal or external). Microbiome screening, nanotechnology diagnostics, and surgical phase recognition are exploratory. The principal barriers to clinical adoption are domain shift, data scarcity, calibration, prospective validation, and workflow integration. We conclude that clinically useful artificial intelligence requires robust external validation, uncertainty quantification, explainable outputs, standardized reporting, and a structured translational pathway from retrospective evidence through regulatory clearance to post-deployment monitoring.

CancersVol. 18(21)
Abu Dhabi University (AE), University of Louisville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon