Extraction and Implantation Speeds in Follicular Unit Excision: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 612 Cases

BACKGROUND: Advances in follicular unit excision (FUE) have substantially improved procedural efficiency. However, real-world extraction and implantation speeds remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To describe typical FUE extraction and implantation speeds and identify factors associated with procedural speed variation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Operative records of FUE performed by 8 surgeons across 5 clinics over 6 months in 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible procedures involved single-surgeon scalp-to-scalp FUE exceeding 1,000 grafts. Extraction and implantation speeds were measured during active surgical graft harvesting and placement. Associations between procedural speed and patient, procedural, surgeon, and device-related factors were evaluated using univariate and multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Analyses included 612 FUE sessions across 526 patients. Mean extraction and implantation speeds were 725.7 and 697.6 grafts/h, respectively. Increased extraction speed was independently associated with larger case sizes, surgeon experience ≥1 year, and a dedicated graft-pulling assistant (all p < .001). Increased implantation speed was independently associated with multi-implanter device utilization (p < .001). Extraction speed was significantly reduced during revision cases (p < .001). Patient age and hair characteristics showed no significant association with speed. CONCLUSION: Real-world FUE extraction and implantation speeds approximate 700 grafts/h, providing a practical benchmark for operative planning and clinical counseling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000005417
Primary Topic
Hair Growth and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extraction and Implantation Speeds in Follicular Unit Excision: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 612 Cases

Leo S.L. Chong
Dermatologic Surgery
Hair Growth and Disorders
article

Extraction and Implantation Speeds in Follicular Unit Excision: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 612 Cases

Leo S.L. Chong
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in follicular unit excision (FUE) have substantially improved procedural efficiency. However, real-world extraction and implantation speeds remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To describe typical FUE extraction and implantation speeds and identify factors associated with procedural speed variation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Operative records of FUE performed by 8 surgeons across 5 clinics over 6 months in 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible procedures involved single-surgeon scalp-to-scalp FUE exceeding 1,000 grafts. Extraction and implantation speeds were measured during active surgical graft harvesting and placement. Associations between procedural speed and patient, procedural, surgeon, and device-related factors were evaluated using univariate and multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Analyses included 612 FUE sessions across 526 patients. Mean extraction and implantation speeds were 725.7 and 697.6 grafts/h, respectively. Increased extraction speed was independently associated with larger case sizes, surgeon experience ≥1 year, and a dedicated graft-pulling assistant (all p < .001). Increased implantation speed was independently associated with multi-implanter device utilization (p < .001). Extraction speed was significantly reduced during revision cases (p < .001). Patient age and hair characteristics showed no significant association with speed. CONCLUSION: Real-world FUE extraction and implantation speeds approximate 700 grafts/h, providing a practical benchmark for operative planning and clinical counseling.

Dermatologic Surgery
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hair Growth and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon