Sex Differences in Lower-Limb Strength Qualities Among Recreationally Active Adults: Implications for Neuromuscular Profiling

Although neuromuscular profiling based on the assessment of multiple strength qualities has received increasing attention, most available evidence derives from athletic populations, leaving limited population-specific descriptive data for recreationally active adults. The aim of the present study was to compare multiple lower-limb strength qualities between recreationally active males and females and provide population-specific descriptive data relevant to neuromuscular profiling. Forty-five male and forty-six female recreationally active adults performed a countermovement jump (CMJ), 10/5 repeated jump test, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), and seated isometric plantarflexion strength test. Dynamic strength index (DSI) was calculated as the ratio of CMJ to IMTP peak force, while reactive strength index (RSI) was calculated as the ratio of jump height (JH) to ground contact time (GCT). DSI was smaller (d = −0.59, 95% CI: −1.00, −0.12, p = 0.011) in males (0.66 ± 0.11) than in females (0.72 ± 0.10). IMTP relative peak force was significantly higher (d = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.85, p < 0.001) in males (36.97 ± 5.59 N/kg) than in females (30.00 ± 4.10 N/kg). However, isometric plantarflexion relative peak force in the seated position did not significantly differ (d = −0.19, 95% CI: −0.57, 0.22, p = 0.377) between males (16.02 ± 2.37 N/kg) and females (16.50 ± 2.84 N/kg). RSI was significantly higher (d = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.26, p < 0.001) in males (1.20 ± 0.35) than in females (0.91 ± 0.32). Males demonstrated greater reactive strength performance and relative maximal strength of the hip and knee extensors than females, whereas relative seated plantar flexor strength was comparable between sexes. The present study extends the available comparative data on strength qualities in recreationally active adults and suggests that comprehensive assessment of multiple strength qualities may help characterize potential training priorities in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14110482
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Lower-Limb Strength Qualities Among Recreationally Active Adults: Implications for Neuromuscular Profiling

Zane Šmite, Līga Plakane, Rolands Cuhalovs
Sports
Sports Performance and Training
article

Sex Differences in Lower-Limb Strength Qualities Among Recreationally Active Adults: Implications for Neuromuscular Profiling

Zane Šmite, Līga Plakane, Rolands Cuhalovs
article en

Abstract

Although neuromuscular profiling based on the assessment of multiple strength qualities has received increasing attention, most available evidence derives from athletic populations, leaving limited population-specific descriptive data for recreationally active adults. The aim of the present study was to compare multiple lower-limb strength qualities between recreationally active males and females and provide population-specific descriptive data relevant to neuromuscular profiling. Forty-five male and forty-six female recreationally active adults performed a countermovement jump (CMJ), 10/5 repeated jump test, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), and seated isometric plantarflexion strength test. Dynamic strength index (DSI) was calculated as the ratio of CMJ to IMTP peak force, while reactive strength index (RSI) was calculated as the ratio of jump height (JH) to ground contact time (GCT). DSI was smaller (d = −0.59, 95% CI: −1.00, −0.12, p = 0.011) in males (0.66 ± 0.11) than in females (0.72 ± 0.10). IMTP relative peak force was significantly higher (d = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.85, p < 0.001) in males (36.97 ± 5.59 N/kg) than in females (30.00 ± 4.10 N/kg). However, isometric plantarflexion relative peak force in the seated position did not significantly differ (d = −0.19, 95% CI: −0.57, 0.22, p = 0.377) between males (16.02 ± 2.37 N/kg) and females (16.50 ± 2.84 N/kg). RSI was significantly higher (d = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.26, p < 0.001) in males (1.20 ± 0.35) than in females (0.91 ± 0.32). Males demonstrated greater reactive strength performance and relative maximal strength of the hip and knee extensors than females, whereas relative seated plantar flexor strength was comparable between sexes. The present study extends the available comparative data on strength qualities in recreationally active adults and suggests that comprehensive assessment of multiple strength qualities may help characterize potential training priorities in this population.

SportsVol. 14(11)
University of Latvia (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Sex Differences in Lower-Limb Strength Qualities Among Recreationally Active Adults: Implications for Neuromuscular Profiling — Zane Šmite, Līga Plakane, et al. · Sports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS