The ethical dimension of AI systems in legal jargon translation: a preliminary assessment

Abstract Despite increasing legal emphasis on accessible language in contractual information, individuals continue to encounter legal documents, such as terms and conditions, imprints, and privacy statements, that remain difficult to understand. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) offers a new opportunity to translate legal jargon into accessible language and to support ongoing efforts to provide legal documents in accessible and inclusive languages. However, the use of LLMs for this purpose raises distinct ethical concerns, including hallucinations, personalization risks, and jurisdictional bias. This paper presents a preliminary ethics framework for evaluating LLM-based legal translation tools, grounded in EU regulations and aligned with the EU High-Level Expert Group’s Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Building on the EU-funded AI4Pol project, which aims to develop an AI-powered tool for translating legal jargon into accessible language, we examine the ethical risks of such systems, focusing on their intended purpose and challenges related to technical robustness, privacy, algorithmic bias, and explainability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01466-9
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethical dimension of AI systems in legal jargon translation: a preliminary assessment

Gjergji Kasneci, Caitlin C. Corrigan, Alexander Kriebitz, Yuxiao Li
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The ethical dimension of AI systems in legal jargon translation: a preliminary assessment

Gjergji Kasneci, Caitlin C. Corrigan, Alexander Kriebitz, Yuxiao Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite increasing legal emphasis on accessible language in contractual information, individuals continue to encounter legal documents, such as terms and conditions, imprints, and privacy statements, that remain difficult to understand. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) offers a new opportunity to translate legal jargon into accessible language and to support ongoing efforts to provide legal documents in accessible and inclusive languages. However, the use of LLMs for this purpose raises distinct ethical concerns, including hallucinations, personalization risks, and jurisdictional bias. This paper presents a preliminary ethics framework for evaluating LLM-based legal translation tools, grounded in EU regulations and aligned with the EU High-Level Expert Group’s Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Building on the EU-funded AI4Pol project, which aims to develop an AI-powered tool for translating legal jargon into accessible language, we examine the ethical risks of such systems, focusing on their intended purpose and challenges related to technical robustness, privacy, algorithmic bias, and explainability.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The ethical dimension of AI systems in legal jargon translation: a preliminary assessment — Gjergji Kasneci, Caitlin C. Corrigan, et al. · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS