Public attitudes toward police surveillance technologies for gun violence reduction: evidence from Illinois

This study examines public support for expanding police use of six surveillance technologies to reduce gun violence: ShotSpotter, doorbell cameras, CCTV, ALPRs, drones, and facial recognition. An online survey of 1,028 Illinois residents found moderate but meaningful overall support (M = 2.84 on a 4-point scale) that varied significantly by technology and demographics. ShotSpotter and residential doorbell cameras received the strongest approval, while drones and facial recognition garnered the lowest. Women, adults aged 65+, and Democrats expressed significantly higher support, yet no overall racial or class-based (income/education) differences emerged, challenging activist narratives about disproportionate opposition among marginalized communities. Conducted in a demographically representative state, these findings reveal a potential gap between elite critiques and public preferences, offering important implications for policing strategy and policy amid ongoing national and global surveillance debates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evidence Base
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/30679125.2026.2755941
Primary Topic
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public attitudes toward police surveillance technologies for gun violence reduction: evidence from Illinois

Magic M. Wade
Evidence Base
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
article

Public attitudes toward police surveillance technologies for gun violence reduction: evidence from Illinois

Magic M. Wade
article en

Abstract

This study examines public support for expanding police use of six surveillance technologies to reduce gun violence: ShotSpotter, doorbell cameras, CCTV, ALPRs, drones, and facial recognition. An online survey of 1,028 Illinois residents found moderate but meaningful overall support (M = 2.84 on a 4-point scale) that varied significantly by technology and demographics. ShotSpotter and residential doorbell cameras received the strongest approval, while drones and facial recognition garnered the lowest. Women, adults aged 65+, and Democrats expressed significantly higher support, yet no overall racial or class-based (income/education) differences emerged, challenging activist narratives about disproportionate opposition among marginalized communities. Conducted in a demographically representative state, these findings reveal a potential gap between elite critiques and public preferences, offering important implications for policing strategy and policy amid ongoing national and global surveillance debates.

Evidence Base
University of Illinois at Springfield (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Public attitudes toward police surveillance technologies for gun violence reduction: evidence from Illinois — Magic M. Wade · Evidence Base (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS