Observer agreement in sonographic glandular tissue component classification and sonographic breast density assessment: a multi-institutional study

The sonographic glandular tissue component (GTC) is a potential imaging biomarker for stratifying breast cancer risk in women with dense breasts. This study evaluated the reproducibility, reliability, and clinical applicability of GTC classification and GTC-based sonographic breast density assessment in a multicenter observer study. Fifteen readers (nine physicians and six sonographers) from 12 institutions independently assessed 100 paired ultrasound images twice, 1 month apart, with the dataset rearranged for the second reading. GTC was qualitatively classified into four categories according to its estimated proportion within the fibroglandular tissue (FGT): minimal, mild, moderate, and marked; minimal/mild were grouped as low GTC and moderate/marked as high GTC. Sonographic breast density was categorized as sonographic dense breast (high GTC), sonographic non-dense breast (visible fat lobules), or intermediate, with intermediate cases further divided into high or low categories using an FGT-to-FAT (subcutaneous and retromammary fat) ratio cutoff of 1. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement was evaluated using κ statistics. Substantial interobserver agreement was observed for the four-class GTC classification, the two-class GTC classification, and sonographic breast density assessment. Intraobserver agreement was moderate for the four-class GTC classification and substantial for the two-class GTC classification and sonographic breast density assessment. The majority-vote sonographic breast density assessment showed substantial agreement with the mammographic ground truth, whereas individual-reader assessments showed moderate concordance with mammographic breast density both overall and in intermediate-density breasts. No significant differences in agreement were observed between physicians and sonographers. Substantial interobserver agreement and moderate-to-substantial intraobserver agreement support the reproducibility and reliability of GTC classification and GTC-based sonographic breast density assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-026-01695-9
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Observer agreement in sonographic glandular tissue component classification and sonographic breast density assessment: a multi-institutional study

Yumi Kokubu, Akifumi Notsu, Fuyo Kimura, Noriko Kurokawa et al.
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Observer agreement in sonographic glandular tissue component classification and sonographic breast density assessment: a multi-institutional study

Yumi Kokubu, Akifumi Notsu, Fuyo Kimura, Noriko Kurokawa, Yukiko Okayama, Yasuko Uchida, Kazutaka Nakashima, Ayumi Izumori, Takayoshi Uematsu, 幸子 磯部, Kazuaki Nakashima, Akina Seki, Kana Taguchi, Kanako Nishiyama, Yoichi Ishibe, Masako Takahashi, Yoshimi Otsuka, Satoko Abe, Mikiko Nishikawa, Youichi Machida
article en

Abstract

The sonographic glandular tissue component (GTC) is a potential imaging biomarker for stratifying breast cancer risk in women with dense breasts. This study evaluated the reproducibility, reliability, and clinical applicability of GTC classification and GTC-based sonographic breast density assessment in a multicenter observer study. Fifteen readers (nine physicians and six sonographers) from 12 institutions independently assessed 100 paired ultrasound images twice, 1 month apart, with the dataset rearranged for the second reading. GTC was qualitatively classified into four categories according to its estimated proportion within the fibroglandular tissue (FGT): minimal, mild, moderate, and marked; minimal/mild were grouped as low GTC and moderate/marked as high GTC. Sonographic breast density was categorized as sonographic dense breast (high GTC), sonographic non-dense breast (visible fat lobules), or intermediate, with intermediate cases further divided into high or low categories using an FGT-to-FAT (subcutaneous and retromammary fat) ratio cutoff of 1. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement was evaluated using κ statistics. Substantial interobserver agreement was observed for the four-class GTC classification, the two-class GTC classification, and sonographic breast density assessment. Intraobserver agreement was moderate for the four-class GTC classification and substantial for the two-class GTC classification and sonographic breast density assessment. The majority-vote sonographic breast density assessment showed substantial agreement with the mammographic ground truth, whereas individual-reader assessments showed moderate concordance with mammographic breast density both overall and in intermediate-density breasts. No significant differences in agreement were observed between physicians and sonographers. Substantial interobserver agreement and moderate-to-substantial intraobserver agreement support the reproducibility and reliability of GTC classification and GTC-based sonographic breast density assessment.

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics
Kawasaki Medical School (JP), Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP), Mizushima Central Hospital (JP), Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association (JP), Ehime University Hospital (JP), Kameda Medical Center (JP), Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital (JP), The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP), Tokushima Breast Care Clinic (JP), Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research (JP), Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon