The Implications of Bots on Psychological Science: A Speculative Article

Scammers, or individuals who purposely give false answers in research surveys (e.g., to earn study compensation), have always been a concern to Psychological Science researchers. However, their potential impact on the field has grown immensely due to contextual factors, including technological advances such as bots that allow scammers to complete large quantities of surveys in a short amount of time. While recent research has focused on how to prevent or detect scammers using bots, little research has considered the implications of bots (and our preventative measures) on the field of Psychological Science. The goal of this speculative paper is to start a conversation about the potential implications of bots on the field, along with changes needed to address potential negative impacts. To do this, we first provide a background on bot attacks on research, which includes the researchers' experience with a recent scammer attack that utilized bots. Next, we propose five ways that bots may impact the field of Psychological Science, along with recommendations for researchers, universities, and journals to help reduce the potential negative impact. This reflective practice can help Psychological Science ensure the field, as a whole, is still meeting its goal to understand the human mind and behavior while engaging in efficient, thoughtful, and ethical practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Reports
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941261504403
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Implications of Bots on Psychological Science: A Speculative Article

Katie M. Lawson, Christopher Hill, Alicia Van Duyn, Ashton Lyvers et al.
Psychological Reports
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

The Implications of Bots on Psychological Science: A Speculative Article

Katie M. Lawson, Christopher Hill, Alicia Van Duyn, Ashton Lyvers, Eli Wibben, Carlie Merriweather
article en

Abstract

Scammers, or individuals who purposely give false answers in research surveys (e.g., to earn study compensation), have always been a concern to Psychological Science researchers. However, their potential impact on the field has grown immensely due to contextual factors, including technological advances such as bots that allow scammers to complete large quantities of surveys in a short amount of time. While recent research has focused on how to prevent or detect scammers using bots, little research has considered the implications of bots (and our preventative measures) on the field of Psychological Science. The goal of this speculative paper is to start a conversation about the potential implications of bots on the field, along with changes needed to address potential negative impacts. To do this, we first provide a background on bot attacks on research, which includes the researchers' experience with a recent scammer attack that utilized bots. Next, we propose five ways that bots may impact the field of Psychological Science, along with recommendations for researchers, universities, and journals to help reduce the potential negative impact. This reflective practice can help Psychological Science ensure the field, as a whole, is still meeting its goal to understand the human mind and behavior while engaging in efficient, thoughtful, and ethical practices.

Psychological Reports
Ball State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon