Divided by conspiracy beliefs: interpersonal conflict and relationship quality

Introduction Belief in conspiracy theories has been linked to a range of social and political outcomes, yet its consequences for close interpersonal relationships remain poorly understood. The present study examined how frequently people experience disagreements and conflicts with their romantic partners that arise specifically because of their differences in conspiracy beliefs and whether such conflicts are associated with lower relationship quality and wellbeing in general. Method Using a UK quota sample recruited through Prolific ( N = 493), participants reported the frequency and strain they experience from conspiracy conflicts with their current or previous romantic partners, alongside measures of relationship satisfaction, life satisfaction, and several relationship context variables. Additionally, we also explored the frequency of conspiracy conflicts across relationships with one's family members, friends, and co-workers. Results More than 20% of participants reported experiencing conspiracy conflicts either “sometimes,” “often,” or “very often” with their current partner, and approximately 33% did so in their previous romantic relationships. Moreover, more than 20% of participants reported having had the experience of their previous romantic relationship ending due to such conflicts. Similar frequencies were also reported across other types of close social bonds. Greater conspiracy conflicts were associated with moderately lower relationship satisfaction, and the strain from such conflicts was associated with slightly lower satisfaction with life in general. Mediation analyses indicated that conspiracy conflicts were associated with greater relationship difficulties and lower trust and closeness, which in turn were related to lower relationship satisfaction. Although several other relationship context variables were correlated with conspiracy conflicts and relationship satisfaction, none significantly moderated the association between these variables. Discussion These findings provide the first estimates of the prevalence of conflicts over conspiracy beliefs in romantic relationships and other types of close relationships. Moreover, they offer cumulative evidence that such conflicts are linked to poorer relationship functioning and may also, at least when experienced in the relationship with one's romantic partner, be associated with lower wellbeing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Social Psychology
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2026.1827061
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divided by conspiracy beliefs: interpersonal conflict and relationship quality

Karen M. Douglas, Jakub Šrol, Dana Godžáková
Frontiers in Social Psychology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Divided by conspiracy beliefs: interpersonal conflict and relationship quality

Karen M. Douglas, Jakub Šrol, Dana Godžáková
article en

Abstract

Introduction Belief in conspiracy theories has been linked to a range of social and political outcomes, yet its consequences for close interpersonal relationships remain poorly understood. The present study examined how frequently people experience disagreements and conflicts with their romantic partners that arise specifically because of their differences in conspiracy beliefs and whether such conflicts are associated with lower relationship quality and wellbeing in general. Method Using a UK quota sample recruited through Prolific ( N = 493), participants reported the frequency and strain they experience from conspiracy conflicts with their current or previous romantic partners, alongside measures of relationship satisfaction, life satisfaction, and several relationship context variables. Additionally, we also explored the frequency of conspiracy conflicts across relationships with one's family members, friends, and co-workers. Results More than 20% of participants reported experiencing conspiracy conflicts either “sometimes,” “often,” or “very often” with their current partner, and approximately 33% did so in their previous romantic relationships. Moreover, more than 20% of participants reported having had the experience of their previous romantic relationship ending due to such conflicts. Similar frequencies were also reported across other types of close social bonds. Greater conspiracy conflicts were associated with moderately lower relationship satisfaction, and the strain from such conflicts was associated with slightly lower satisfaction with life in general. Mediation analyses indicated that conspiracy conflicts were associated with greater relationship difficulties and lower trust and closeness, which in turn were related to lower relationship satisfaction. Although several other relationship context variables were correlated with conspiracy conflicts and relationship satisfaction, none significantly moderated the association between these variables. Discussion These findings provide the first estimates of the prevalence of conflicts over conspiracy beliefs in romantic relationships and other types of close relationships. Moreover, they offer cumulative evidence that such conflicts are linked to poorer relationship functioning and may also, at least when experienced in the relationship with one's romantic partner, be associated with lower wellbeing.

Frontiers in Social PsychologyVol. 4
University of East London (GB), Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Institute of Experimental Psychology of the Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon