Treatise on the Proposed Chronology Protection Law Derived from Quantum Mechanics — Second Edition — Revised Introduction with Experimental Proposal

This treatise proposes that Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture should be grounded in quantum mechanics rather than remain a conjecture about general relativity. We interpret the measurement process in the double-slit experiment as a manifestation of a chronology protection law: the universe enforces the principle of non-contradiction — that a particle cannot be recorded as being in two places with definite which-path information while also exhibiting interference. We formalize as A_protected(h) = A(h) * exp[-λ * V(h) * S_loop], where V=1 for contradictory histories, S_loop is loop action, λ is protection coupling analogous to G. Unique contributions: (1) Inversion of Hawking — double-slit as laboratory demonstration of protection, (2) Entanglement as retrocausal erasure preserving light-speed limit c, (3) Falsifiable experimental test via P-CTC circuits on IBM Quantum ibm_kingston with tunable paradox strength r. Author: Robert Aaron TseglinDate: 2026-11-03Keywords: chronology protection, closed timelike curves, quantum eraser, P-CTC, double-slit, retrocausality

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23919189
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatise on the Proposed Chronology Protection Law Derived from Quantum Mechanics — Second Edition — Revised Introduction with Experimental Proposal

Robert Aaron Tseglin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
article

Treatise on the Proposed Chronology Protection Law Derived from Quantum Mechanics — Second Edition — Revised Introduction with Experimental Proposal

Robert Aaron Tseglin
article en

Abstract

This treatise proposes that Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture should be grounded in quantum mechanics rather than remain a conjecture about general relativity. We interpret the measurement process in the double-slit experiment as a manifestation of a chronology protection law: the universe enforces the principle of non-contradiction — that a particle cannot be recorded as being in two places with definite which-path information while also exhibiting interference. We formalize as A_protected(h) = A(h) * exp[-λ * V(h) * S_loop], where V=1 for contradictory histories, S_loop is loop action, λ is protection coupling analogous to G. Unique contributions: (1) Inversion of Hawking — double-slit as laboratory demonstration of protection, (2) Entanglement as retrocausal erasure preserving light-speed limit c, (3) Falsifiable experimental test via P-CTC circuits on IBM Quantum ibm_kingston with tunable paradox strength r. Author: Robert Aaron TseglinDate: 2026-11-03Keywords: chronology protection, closed timelike curves, quantum eraser, P-CTC, double-slit, retrocausality

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon