ESG Credibility and Firm Profitability in An Emerging Market: Evidence from ESG Controversies and ESG Gap in Indonesia

ESG is an important channel for a firm's relationship with its stakeholders. The firms are required to not only focus on profit, but they should also consider environmental, social, and governance. This study examines the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and firm profitability in an emerging market, with a particular emphasis on ESG credibility. Using a balanced panel dataset of 58 firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) over the period 2021–2024 (232 firm-year observations), this study employs ESG data from Refinitiv/LSEG and annual financial statements to measure profitability using Return on Assets (ROA). The empirical model is estimated using fixed-effects panel regression with firm-level clustered robust standard errors. The results indicate that the direct relationship between ESG performance and profitability is not supported in the Indonesian context. However, reputational risk plays a critical role: ESG controversies are significantly associated with profitability, and when operationalized as a high-controversy indicator (Controversy High), this variable exerts a negative effect on ROA. The key finding of this study demonstrates that the ESG Gap (ESG Score − ESGC) has a negative and highly significant impact on ROA, indicating the presence of a credibility penalty when the discrepancy between headline ESG performance and controversy-adjusted ESG scores widens. Robustness tests using an alternative profitability proxy (Net Margin) and alternative ESG measures confirm that the direct effect of ESG on profitability is relatively weak, whereas ESG credibility indicators are more informative. This study contributes to the literature by reinforcing the ESG credibility perspective and providing empirical evidence of reputational penalties and potential greenwashing in emerging markets. Keywords: ESG credibility; ESG gap; ESG controversies; profitability (ROA); fixed effects panel regression

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Finance Taxation and Auditing (JAFTA)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28932/jafta.v8i2.15724
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG Credibility and Firm Profitability in An Emerging Market: Evidence from ESG Controversies and ESG Gap in Indonesia

Meythi Meythi, Riki Martusa, William Rudy Sugiharto, Indra Philemon
Journal of Accounting Finance Taxation and Auditing (JAFTA)
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

ESG Credibility and Firm Profitability in An Emerging Market: Evidence from ESG Controversies and ESG Gap in Indonesia

Meythi Meythi, Riki Martusa, William Rudy Sugiharto, Indra Philemon
article en

Abstract

ESG is an important channel for a firm's relationship with its stakeholders. The firms are required to not only focus on profit, but they should also consider environmental, social, and governance. This study examines the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and firm profitability in an emerging market, with a particular emphasis on ESG credibility. Using a balanced panel dataset of 58 firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) over the period 2021–2024 (232 firm-year observations), this study employs ESG data from Refinitiv/LSEG and annual financial statements to measure profitability using Return on Assets (ROA). The empirical model is estimated using fixed-effects panel regression with firm-level clustered robust standard errors. The results indicate that the direct relationship between ESG performance and profitability is not supported in the Indonesian context. However, reputational risk plays a critical role: ESG controversies are significantly associated with profitability, and when operationalized as a high-controversy indicator (Controversy High), this variable exerts a negative effect on ROA. The key finding of this study demonstrates that the ESG Gap (ESG Score − ESGC) has a negative and highly significant impact on ROA, indicating the presence of a credibility penalty when the discrepancy between headline ESG performance and controversy-adjusted ESG scores widens. Robustness tests using an alternative profitability proxy (Net Margin) and alternative ESG measures confirm that the direct effect of ESG on profitability is relatively weak, whereas ESG credibility indicators are more informative. This study contributes to the literature by reinforcing the ESG credibility perspective and providing empirical evidence of reputational penalties and potential greenwashing in emerging markets. Keywords: ESG credibility; ESG gap; ESG controversies; profitability (ROA); fixed effects panel regression

Journal of Accounting Finance Taxation and Auditing (JAFTA)Vol. 8(2)
Maranatha Christian University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon