Looking Back to Understand the Present: Reliability and Validity of Retrospective Relationship Satisfaction Timelines

Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and concurrent validity of retrospective graphical timelines of couple relationship satisfaction development (RSR timelines). Relationship satisfaction is a central indicator of couple and family functioning. In clinical and research settings, obtaining a comprehensive overview of relationship histories can be challenging due to the complexity of couple dynamics. RSR timelines offer a time-efficient method to capture relationship histories, e.g., in the context of couple- and family-based interventions. A total of 271 German families were followed up for 18 years after a preventive intervention. At the 18-year follow-up (FU18), mothers were asked to draw RSR timelines for their relationship with the father of the index child. Based on these timelines, six distinct relationship history groups were reliably distinguished: Stable Satisfied (25% of couples), Crisis Managed (23%), Dissatisfied (4%), Separated (40%), Separation by Death (5%), and parents who never had a relationship (3%). The RSR scores showed moderate to strong correspondence with prospectively collected relationship satisfaction ratings. Relationship history groups were associated with several concurrent relationship, individual, and offspring outcomes, with some associations with offspring functioning differing by child sex. RSR timelines showed preliminary evidence of reliability and validity and may have potential as a time-efficient method for capturing relationship histories. Future research should examine their clinical utility in the context of couple- and family-based interventions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Family Therapy
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-026-09801-2
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looking Back to Understand the Present: Reliability and Validity of Retrospective Relationship Satisfaction Timelines

Kurt Hahlweg, Donald H. Baucom, Ann‐Katrin Job
Contemporary Family Therapy
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Looking Back to Understand the Present: Reliability and Validity of Retrospective Relationship Satisfaction Timelines

Kurt Hahlweg, Donald H. Baucom, Ann‐Katrin Job
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and concurrent validity of retrospective graphical timelines of couple relationship satisfaction development (RSR timelines). Relationship satisfaction is a central indicator of couple and family functioning. In clinical and research settings, obtaining a comprehensive overview of relationship histories can be challenging due to the complexity of couple dynamics. RSR timelines offer a time-efficient method to capture relationship histories, e.g., in the context of couple- and family-based interventions. A total of 271 German families were followed up for 18 years after a preventive intervention. At the 18-year follow-up (FU18), mothers were asked to draw RSR timelines for their relationship with the father of the index child. Based on these timelines, six distinct relationship history groups were reliably distinguished: Stable Satisfied (25% of couples), Crisis Managed (23%), Dissatisfied (4%), Separated (40%), Separation by Death (5%), and parents who never had a relationship (3%). The RSR scores showed moderate to strong correspondence with prospectively collected relationship satisfaction ratings. Relationship history groups were associated with several concurrent relationship, individual, and offspring outcomes, with some associations with offspring functioning differing by child sex. RSR timelines showed preliminary evidence of reliability and validity and may have potential as a time-efficient method for capturing relationship histories. Future research should examine their clinical utility in the context of couple- and family-based interventions.

Contemporary Family Therapy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon