Regulatory Science: A Condition of Innovation for AI as a Medical Device

AI systems are increasingly being introduced into healthcare, many of them meeting the threshold for regulation as medical devices. However, the regulatory frameworks built to evaluate their safety and performance were designed for stable, tangible products rather than the highly context-dependent, frequently updating software systems whose risks emerge in real-world use. This creates a dilemma for health systems: the pressure to adopt AI at pace sits uneasily alongside the need to validate, monitor, and govern it vigilantly. This piece will describe how regulatory science offers a route through this tension to realise the benefits of innovation safely. Drawing on national infrastructure and case studies from the Centre of Excellence for Regulatory Science and Innovation in AI and Digital Health (CERSI-AI), this article sets out what regulatory science looks like in practice, and why building the governance and capability to deploy AI responsibly may prove harder than building the technology itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EMJ Innovation
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33590/emjinnov/0269016e.
Primary Topic
Healthcare Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory Science: A Condition of Innovation for AI as a Medical Device

Charlotte Radovanovic, Ellen Coughlan
EMJ Innovation
Healthcare Regulation
article

Regulatory Science: A Condition of Innovation for AI as a Medical Device

Charlotte Radovanovic, Ellen Coughlan
article en

Abstract

AI systems are increasingly being introduced into healthcare, many of them meeting the threshold for regulation as medical devices. However, the regulatory frameworks built to evaluate their safety and performance were designed for stable, tangible products rather than the highly context-dependent, frequently updating software systems whose risks emerge in real-world use. This creates a dilemma for health systems: the pressure to adopt AI at pace sits uneasily alongside the need to validate, monitor, and govern it vigilantly. This piece will describe how regulatory science offers a route through this tension to realise the benefits of innovation safely. Drawing on national infrastructure and case studies from the Centre of Excellence for Regulatory Science and Innovation in AI and Digital Health (CERSI-AI), this article sets out what regulatory science looks like in practice, and why building the governance and capability to deploy AI responsibly may prove harder than building the technology itself.

EMJ Innovation
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Healthcare Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Regulatory Science: A Condition of Innovation for AI as a Medical Device — Charlotte Radovanovic, Ellen Coughlan · EMJ Innovation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS