Justicia transicional, amnistía, indulto y cosa juzgada fraudulenta: A veinticinco años de un fallo emblemático de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

The present study examines the judgment issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on March 14,2001, resolving Barrios Altos v. Peru, which led to the creation of a new standard concerning transitional justice mechanisms, including the use of amnesty and pardon, through the development of the doctrine of fraudulent res judicata. The study examines this doctrine because it reshapes classical conceptions of criminal procedural law, specifically the doctrine of material res judicata and the non bis in idem principle, and its tension with fundamental human rights, namely the right to life, the right to physicalintegrity, the right to truth, and judicial guarantees.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dehuidela/Revista latinoamericana de derechos humanos/Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos (San José)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.37-2.9
Primary Topic
War, Law, and Justice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Justicia transicional, amnistía, indulto y cosa juzgada fraudulenta: A veinticinco años de un fallo emblemático de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

José Alejandro Piedra Pérez
Dehuidela/Revista latinoamericana de derechos humanos/Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos (San José)
War, Law, and Justice
article

Justicia transicional, amnistía, indulto y cosa juzgada fraudulenta: A veinticinco años de un fallo emblemático de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

José Alejandro Piedra Pérez
article en

Abstract

The present study examines the judgment issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on March 14,2001, resolving Barrios Altos v. Peru, which led to the creation of a new standard concerning transitional justice mechanisms, including the use of amnesty and pardon, through the development of the doctrine of fraudulent res judicata. The study examines this doctrine because it reshapes classical conceptions of criminal procedural law, specifically the doctrine of material res judicata and the non bis in idem principle, and its tension with fundamental human rights, namely the right to life, the right to physicalintegrity, the right to truth, and judicial guarantees.

Dehuidela/Revista latinoamericana de derechos humanos/Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos (San José)Vol. 37(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
War, Law, and Justice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon