Sustainability data traceability in enterprise digital reporting

The article develops an organizational and methodological approach to ensuring sustainability data traceability in enterprise digital reporting. Drawing on academic research and institutional guidance, it distinguishes traceability from data accuracy and identifies three interrelated dimensions: informational, procedural, and control-managerial. Traceability is defined as the capacity to identify the source of an ESG indicator, reconstruct its transformations, establish accountability, and verify the approved disclosure. The approach integrates data governance and risk-based internal control through a sequence linking sources, data operations, risks, controls, evidence, and reported indicators. A risk-control matrix covers five reporting stages: collection, transfer, processing, verification and approval, and disclosure. An electronic indicator passport records reporting boundaries, calculation methods, source versions, corrections, responsible persons, and evidence of approval. Direct and reverse tracing are proposed to test the completeness of data flows and the reproducibility of disclosed indicators. Implementation follows five stages: indicator identification, mapping information flows, risk assessment and control design, introducing indicator passports and procedures, and performance evaluation. Evaluation criteria comprise information coverage, independent reproducibility, change control, and timely resolution of discrepancies. The approach can be adapted for enterprises with varying levels of digital maturity, including those with controlled electronic registers. Its methodological contribution lies in combining data provenance, organizational accountability, and verifiable controls within a coherent reporting process. The approach awaits empirical validation; its effects on reporting quality, preparation time, and control costs require further investigation. Keywords: ESG data, data traceability, digital reporting, enterprise sustainability, data governance, risk-based control, internal control, electronic indicator passport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actual problems of innovative economy and law
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2026-5-11
Primary Topic
Financial Reporting and XBRL
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability data traceability in enterprise digital reporting

Vіktorіya Gonchar, Olha Borshch, Anna Boiko, Vladyslav Panashchenko
Actual problems of innovative economy and law
Financial Reporting and XBRL
article

Sustainability data traceability in enterprise digital reporting

Vіktorіya Gonchar, Olha Borshch, Anna Boiko, Vladyslav Panashchenko
article en

Abstract

The article develops an organizational and methodological approach to ensuring sustainability data traceability in enterprise digital reporting. Drawing on academic research and institutional guidance, it distinguishes traceability from data accuracy and identifies three interrelated dimensions: informational, procedural, and control-managerial. Traceability is defined as the capacity to identify the source of an ESG indicator, reconstruct its transformations, establish accountability, and verify the approved disclosure. The approach integrates data governance and risk-based internal control through a sequence linking sources, data operations, risks, controls, evidence, and reported indicators. A risk-control matrix covers five reporting stages: collection, transfer, processing, verification and approval, and disclosure. An electronic indicator passport records reporting boundaries, calculation methods, source versions, corrections, responsible persons, and evidence of approval. Direct and reverse tracing are proposed to test the completeness of data flows and the reproducibility of disclosed indicators. Implementation follows five stages: indicator identification, mapping information flows, risk assessment and control design, introducing indicator passports and procedures, and performance evaluation. Evaluation criteria comprise information coverage, independent reproducibility, change control, and timely resolution of discrepancies. The approach can be adapted for enterprises with varying levels of digital maturity, including those with controlled electronic registers. Its methodological contribution lies in combining data provenance, organizational accountability, and verifiable controls within a coherent reporting process. The approach awaits empirical validation; its effects on reporting quality, preparation time, and control costs require further investigation. Keywords: ESG data, data traceability, digital reporting, enterprise sustainability, data governance, risk-based control, internal control, electronic indicator passport.

Actual problems of innovative economy and lawVol. 2026(5)
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Financial Reporting and XBRL
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon