Late Adolescents’ Adverse and Benevolent Childhood Experiences and Mental Health Outcomes: A Cluster Analysis

ABSTRACT Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are linked to poorer mental health, but benevolent childhood experiences (BCEs) may buffer these effects; their co‐occurrence in late adolescence is understudied. This study examined which subgroups emerge from ACE–BCE profiles, and how they differ in psychological wellbeing and distress. Two‐step cluster analysis identified four profiles ( N = 200; ages 18–19 years, M = 18.65): High ACE–Low BCE ( n = 38, 19.0%), High ACE–High BCE ( n = 41, 20.5%), Low ACE–Low BCE ( n = 38, 19.0%), and Low ACE–High BCE ( n = 83, 41.5%). One‐way ANOVAs with Tukey post hoc tests showed significant wellbeing and distress differences. Higher BCEs were associated with greater wellbeing regardless of ACEs; High ACE–High BCE adolescents reported less distress than High ACE–Low BCE, who fared worst. Findings support ACEs and BCEs as distinct, co‐occurring dimensions, not opposite ends of one continuum; counselors should consider both.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Counseling & Development
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.70085
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Late Adolescents’ Adverse and Benevolent Childhood Experiences and Mental Health Outcomes: A Cluster Analysis

Emily Kitching, Margaret M. Poandl
Journal of Counseling & Development
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Late Adolescents’ Adverse and Benevolent Childhood Experiences and Mental Health Outcomes: A Cluster Analysis

Emily Kitching, Margaret M. Poandl
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are linked to poorer mental health, but benevolent childhood experiences (BCEs) may buffer these effects; their co‐occurrence in late adolescence is understudied. This study examined which subgroups emerge from ACE–BCE profiles, and how they differ in psychological wellbeing and distress. Two‐step cluster analysis identified four profiles ( N = 200; ages 18–19 years, M = 18.65): High ACE–Low BCE ( n = 38, 19.0%), High ACE–High BCE ( n = 41, 20.5%), Low ACE–Low BCE ( n = 38, 19.0%), and Low ACE–High BCE ( n = 83, 41.5%). One‐way ANOVAs with Tukey post hoc tests showed significant wellbeing and distress differences. Higher BCEs were associated with greater wellbeing regardless of ACEs; High ACE–High BCE adolescents reported less distress than High ACE–Low BCE, who fared worst. Findings support ACEs and BCEs as distinct, co‐occurring dimensions, not opposite ends of one continuum; counselors should consider both.

Journal of Counseling & Development
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon