Intersectionality in Digital Health Literacy and Digital Health Application Use in Germany: A MAIHDA Study by Gender, Educational Attainment, and Generation

Background/Objectives: Social determinants of health (SDOHs) are linked to inequities in digital health application (DHA) use and digital health literacy (DHL), a predictor of DHA use, but few studies have examined these inequities intersectionally. This study examined intersectional differences by gender, educational attainment, and generation. Methods: Data were obtained from an online cross-sectional survey (STELLAR; N = 1200) in Germany. Intersectionality was assessed using Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA), with the intersections of gender, educational attainment, and generation defining strata for both outcomes. Results: Educational attainment was the strongest predictor of DHL and was associated with DHA use; gender was not significant for either. Generation was associated with DHA use, with higher odds for Generation Y and Z than for Traditionalists, but was not associated with DHL. Predicted DHL was highest among women with higher education from the Traditionalist or Generation Y group and lowest among men with basic education from Generation Z. Predicted DHA use was highest among women with higher education from Generation Z and lowest among men with basic education from the Baby Boomer generation. Additive main effects explained a greater share of the between-stratum variance for DHA use than for DHL, while the proportion of total variance attributable to strata remained limited for both outcomes. Conclusions: MAIHDA can identify population groups at greater risk of second-level digital divide-related inequities in DHL and DHA use, informing population-level measures to strengthen DHL and improve DHA use. Further research should clarify the underlying mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14213750
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectionality in Digital Health Literacy and Digital Health Application Use in Germany: A MAIHDA Study by Gender, Educational Attainment, and Generation

Cristina Carmen Ciupitu-Plath, Niels Hannemann, Sidra Khan‐Gökkaya, Daniel Lüdecke et al.
Healthcare
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Intersectionality in Digital Health Literacy and Digital Health Application Use in Germany: A MAIHDA Study by Gender, Educational Attainment, and Generation

Cristina Carmen Ciupitu-Plath, Niels Hannemann, Sidra Khan‐Gökkaya, Daniel Lüdecke, Birgit Babitsch, Finn Houska
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Social determinants of health (SDOHs) are linked to inequities in digital health application (DHA) use and digital health literacy (DHL), a predictor of DHA use, but few studies have examined these inequities intersectionally. This study examined intersectional differences by gender, educational attainment, and generation. Methods: Data were obtained from an online cross-sectional survey (STELLAR; N = 1200) in Germany. Intersectionality was assessed using Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA), with the intersections of gender, educational attainment, and generation defining strata for both outcomes. Results: Educational attainment was the strongest predictor of DHL and was associated with DHA use; gender was not significant for either. Generation was associated with DHA use, with higher odds for Generation Y and Z than for Traditionalists, but was not associated with DHL. Predicted DHL was highest among women with higher education from the Traditionalist or Generation Y group and lowest among men with basic education from Generation Z. Predicted DHA use was highest among women with higher education from Generation Z and lowest among men with basic education from the Baby Boomer generation. Additive main effects explained a greater share of the between-stratum variance for DHA use than for DHL, while the proportion of total variance attributable to strata remained limited for both outcomes. Conclusions: MAIHDA can identify population groups at greater risk of second-level digital divide-related inequities in DHL and DHA use, informing population-level measures to strengthen DHL and improve DHA use. Further research should clarify the underlying mechanisms.

HealthcareVol. 14(21)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Osnabrück University (DE), Bastyr University (US), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Hochschule Osnabrück (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon