Promoting equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials in Australia: designing a think tank using aspects of World Café and Yarning Circle methodologies

Abstract Background Equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials is widely acknowledged as a scientific and ethical imperative, yet persistent barriers remain relating to cultural, linguistic, geographical and other social and structural determinants of health. Such determinants become pervasive systemic barriers that compromise the real-world relevance of randomised trials and perpetuate health inequities. International and national Australian regulatory bodies promote equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials, but implementation is inconsistent. This commentary describes the methodological process to design and conduct a think tank event as a strategy to raise awareness and promote the consideration of equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials in Australia. Main body Through outreach via university and clinical research networks, we identified and invited 27 attendees to a think tank event that explored strategies for advancing equity, diversity and inclusion in Australian randomised trials. Held in Brisbane, Queensland, attendees included academics, clinician researchers, social impact and cultural diversity professionals, research ethics and governance professionals, consumer and community representatives, and other research-adjacent service providers. The event drew upon two participatory discussion methodologies, World Café and Yarning Circle, to facilitate in-depth conversation amongst the diverse attendees. Discussions flowed from three guiding questions regarding randomised trials in Australia: “What does health equity mean?”, “what factors influence health equity?”, and “what are the next steps?” Combining World Café’s structured, idea-generating format with Yarning Circle’s culturally grounded, relational approach enabled both breadth and depth of insights. Insights generated from the think tank event were graphically recorded by a professional artist, which will be combined with other collected data (online and table notes) to inform future actions. Conclusion Addressing equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials requires moving beyond policy statements to practical, collaborative action. Participatory methods such as World Café and Yarning Circle are favourable approaches for fostering inclusive dialogue and co-designing ideas that can inform future action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-10046-5
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials in Australia: designing a think tank using aspects of World Café and Yarning Circle methodologies

Elise Strange, Bec Jenkinson, Ingrid J. Hickman, Nathalia Costa et al.
Trials
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Promoting equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials in Australia: designing a think tank using aspects of World Café and Yarning Circle methodologies

Elise Strange, Bec Jenkinson, Ingrid J. Hickman, Nathalia Costa, Nadine Elizabeth Foster, Kate A. Aitchison, Mark Liu, Lorraine Tutton
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials is widely acknowledged as a scientific and ethical imperative, yet persistent barriers remain relating to cultural, linguistic, geographical and other social and structural determinants of health. Such determinants become pervasive systemic barriers that compromise the real-world relevance of randomised trials and perpetuate health inequities. International and national Australian regulatory bodies promote equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials, but implementation is inconsistent. This commentary describes the methodological process to design and conduct a think tank event as a strategy to raise awareness and promote the consideration of equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials in Australia. Main body Through outreach via university and clinical research networks, we identified and invited 27 attendees to a think tank event that explored strategies for advancing equity, diversity and inclusion in Australian randomised trials. Held in Brisbane, Queensland, attendees included academics, clinician researchers, social impact and cultural diversity professionals, research ethics and governance professionals, consumer and community representatives, and other research-adjacent service providers. The event drew upon two participatory discussion methodologies, World Café and Yarning Circle, to facilitate in-depth conversation amongst the diverse attendees. Discussions flowed from three guiding questions regarding randomised trials in Australia: “What does health equity mean?”, “what factors influence health equity?”, and “what are the next steps?” Combining World Café’s structured, idea-generating format with Yarning Circle’s culturally grounded, relational approach enabled both breadth and depth of insights. Insights generated from the think tank event were graphically recorded by a professional artist, which will be combined with other collected data (online and table notes) to inform future actions. Conclusion Addressing equity, diversity and inclusion in randomised trials requires moving beyond policy statements to practical, collaborative action. Participatory methods such as World Café and Yarning Circle are favourable approaches for fostering inclusive dialogue and co-designing ideas that can inform future action.

TrialsVol. 27(1)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Tharawal Aboriginal (AU), Metro North Hospital and Health Service (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon