Agreement About What, Disagreement About How Much: Australian Threat Perceptions of China, 1996–2025

ABSTRACT Far more Australians see China as a threat to their country's security than did 20 years ago, but the headline figure hides what changed. Two distinct processes can raise it: more people recognising a threat at all, or those who already recognised one coming to regard it as severe. The analysis separates them, using the Australian Election Study, which has put the same question to voters after every federal election since 1996. The rise was predominantly of the first kind, and it occurred evenly across party lines. The second kind was one‐sided: Coalition supporters shifted from thinking a threat fairly likely to thinking it very likely, while for Labour supporters the same shift cannot be established. The divergence appears for China alone among the countries respondents were asked about, and is larger among the politically engaged—both consistent with supporters taking their lead from party signals, though neither establishes the mechanism. Australia's bipartisan consensus on China thus rests on a public that agrees about the character of the threat while drifting apart over its urgency, a division the usual way of reporting these data cannot show.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Politics & History
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70116
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agreement About What, Disagreement About How Much: Australian Threat Perceptions of China, 1996–2025

Liang Jiang
Australian Journal of Politics & History
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Agreement About What, Disagreement About How Much: Australian Threat Perceptions of China, 1996–2025

Liang Jiang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Far more Australians see China as a threat to their country's security than did 20 years ago, but the headline figure hides what changed. Two distinct processes can raise it: more people recognising a threat at all, or those who already recognised one coming to regard it as severe. The analysis separates them, using the Australian Election Study, which has put the same question to voters after every federal election since 1996. The rise was predominantly of the first kind, and it occurred evenly across party lines. The second kind was one‐sided: Coalition supporters shifted from thinking a threat fairly likely to thinking it very likely, while for Labour supporters the same shift cannot be established. The divergence appears for China alone among the countries respondents were asked about, and is larger among the politically engaged—both consistent with supporters taking their lead from party signals, though neither establishes the mechanism. Australia's bipartisan consensus on China thus rests on a public that agrees about the character of the threat while drifting apart over its urgency, a division the usual way of reporting these data cannot show.

Australian Journal of Politics & History
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Agreement About What, Disagreement About How Much: Australian Threat Perceptions of China, 1996–2025 — Liang Jiang · Australian Journal of Politics & History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS