Resilient Modulus of SCBA-Modified Granular Subbases: Random Experimental Forest Analysis

Determining the resilient modulus of granular subbases modified with agro-industrial residues is experimentally demanding and subject to substantial variability. This study evaluates the axial resilient response of a granular subbase modified with sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) and examines the ability of a Random Forest model to estimate the resilient modulus under different loading and confinement conditions. SCBA was incorporated as an addition relative to the dry mass of the granular material. The resilient-modulus analysis considered SCBA contents of 0%, 5%, and 10%. Furthermore, a 15% mixture was additionally characterized through compaction and the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests but was not included in the quantitative resilient-modulus analysis because a sufficiently reliable response was not obtained under the applied cyclic stress sequence. Among the resilient-modulus conditions analyzed, the 5% mixture exhibited the most favorable mechanical response, with greater stability and lower permanent strain accumulation than the control and 10% mixtures; however, this value should not be interpreted as a global optimum because intermediate dosages around 5% were not evaluated. For the machine learning analysis, the dependence among consecutive experimental readings was explicitly considered and variables derived from the resilient cycle were excluded to prevent target leakage. Under the primary leave-one-sequence-out validation scheme, the Random Forest model using variables known before testing achieved R2 = 0.78 (95% block-bootstrap CI 0.59–0.89) and RMSE = 38.9 MPa, comparable to the classical k-θ power-law model (R2 = 0.84; RMSE = 32.5 MPa). Extrapolation to an unseen SCBA level remained limited. These results indicate that Random Forest can serve as a complementary surrogate within the tested stress and material domain, but additional specimens and intermediate SCBA dosages are required before generalizing the model or defining an optimum ash content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11110402
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilient Modulus of SCBA-Modified Granular Subbases: Random Experimental Forest Analysis

Fernando Gutiérrez-Portela, Oscar Augusto Diaz Triana, Julián Andrés Pulecio-Díaz, Yelena Hernández-Atencia et al.
Infrastructures
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Resilient Modulus of SCBA-Modified Granular Subbases: Random Experimental Forest Analysis

Fernando Gutiérrez-Portela, Oscar Augusto Diaz Triana, Julián Andrés Pulecio-Díaz, Yelena Hernández-Atencia, Fabiana Forero-Muñoz
article en

Abstract

Determining the resilient modulus of granular subbases modified with agro-industrial residues is experimentally demanding and subject to substantial variability. This study evaluates the axial resilient response of a granular subbase modified with sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) and examines the ability of a Random Forest model to estimate the resilient modulus under different loading and confinement conditions. SCBA was incorporated as an addition relative to the dry mass of the granular material. The resilient-modulus analysis considered SCBA contents of 0%, 5%, and 10%. Furthermore, a 15% mixture was additionally characterized through compaction and the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests but was not included in the quantitative resilient-modulus analysis because a sufficiently reliable response was not obtained under the applied cyclic stress sequence. Among the resilient-modulus conditions analyzed, the 5% mixture exhibited the most favorable mechanical response, with greater stability and lower permanent strain accumulation than the control and 10% mixtures; however, this value should not be interpreted as a global optimum because intermediate dosages around 5% were not evaluated. For the machine learning analysis, the dependence among consecutive experimental readings was explicitly considered and variables derived from the resilient cycle were excluded to prevent target leakage. Under the primary leave-one-sequence-out validation scheme, the Random Forest model using variables known before testing achieved R2 = 0.78 (95% block-bootstrap CI 0.59–0.89) and RMSE = 38.9 MPa, comparable to the classical k-θ power-law model (R2 = 0.84; RMSE = 32.5 MPa). Extrapolation to an unseen SCBA level remained limited. These results indicate that Random Forest can serve as a complementary surrogate within the tested stress and material domain, but additional specimens and intermediate SCBA dosages are required before generalizing the model or defining an optimum ash content.

InfrastructuresVol. 11(11)
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon