Shaping Inquiry: Bridging the Rhetoric, Ethics, and Design of Research Questions in Technical Communication Studies

Research question formulation shapes inquiry, methodology, and contributions in technical and professional communication (TPC) studies. This content analysis examined research questions from five leading TPC journals (2015–2024) across rhetorical, ethical, and design dimensions using a systematic framework. Analysis of 110 articles reveals patterns broadly consistent with theoretical accounts of TPC’s evolution: research questions frequently appear to challenge power structures, target multiple audiences simultaneously, and signal primarily qualitative or mixed-methods approaches. These patterns align with scholarly narratives about the field’s social justice turn and methodological pluralism. A fraction of published research questions lacks clear methodological alignment, a pattern with implications for research practice and editorial review. This study offers empirical documentation of research question patterns in contemporary TPC scholarship and introduces a multi-dimensional framework that offers a shared vocabulary for constructing, reviewing, and discussing research questions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2026.2757815
Primary Topic
Communication Studies and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shaping Inquiry: Bridging the Rhetoric, Ethics, and Design of Research Questions in Technical Communication Studies

Jason Chew Kit Tham, Damilola F. Adebayo, Iveren Olubunmi Agatha Akula
Technical Communication Quarterly
Communication Studies and Media
article

Shaping Inquiry: Bridging the Rhetoric, Ethics, and Design of Research Questions in Technical Communication Studies

Jason Chew Kit Tham, Damilola F. Adebayo, Iveren Olubunmi Agatha Akula
article en

Abstract

Research question formulation shapes inquiry, methodology, and contributions in technical and professional communication (TPC) studies. This content analysis examined research questions from five leading TPC journals (2015–2024) across rhetorical, ethical, and design dimensions using a systematic framework. Analysis of 110 articles reveals patterns broadly consistent with theoretical accounts of TPC’s evolution: research questions frequently appear to challenge power structures, target multiple audiences simultaneously, and signal primarily qualitative or mixed-methods approaches. These patterns align with scholarly narratives about the field’s social justice turn and methodological pluralism. A fraction of published research questions lacks clear methodological alignment, a pattern with implications for research practice and editorial review. This study offers empirical documentation of research question patterns in contemporary TPC scholarship and introduces a multi-dimensional framework that offers a shared vocabulary for constructing, reviewing, and discussing research questions.

Technical Communication Quarterly
Texas Tech University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Communication Studies and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon