Experimental Mapping of Air–Water Two-Phase Flows: Configuration and Injection Effects in T-Junction Minichannels

This paper investigates air–water two-phase flow regimes in a horizontal T-junction mini-channel with a 1 × 1 mm2 main mini-channel and a 0.3 × 0.3 mm2 side channel. The resulting cross-sectional area ratio of about 11:1 lies outside the range covered by most previous studies. Two injection configurations were compared systematically: in the first, air flows through the main channel and water enters through the side branch; in the second, the two ports are swapped. In the first configuration, the gas superficial velocity ranged from Jg = 1.7 × 10−3 to 1.5 m/s and the liquid superficial velocity from Jℓ = 2.7 × 10−3 to 0.1 m/s. In the second, Jg ranged from 1.5 × 10−2 to 12.5 m/s and Jℓ from 1.7 × 10−3 to 0.28 m/s. Six flow regimes were identified: monodispersed bubbles, slug–bubbles, slug–bubble–-slug, slug, wavy annular and annular flow. From these observations, flow maps were built for each configuration: one in terms of the superficial velocities Jg and Jℓ and one in terms of the momentum flux ratio XM and the gas Weber number Weg. The maps show that the flow pattern is strongly sensitive to the injection mode, and that the transition boundaries deviate substantially from those of maps in literature. The set of regimes itself also depends on the configuration. Slug–bubble–slug and annular flows occur only in the first configuration, whereas monodispersed bubbles, slug–bubbles and wavy annular flow occur only in the second. Slug flow is the only regime common to both. For instance, direct visual observation at identical flow rates confirms that the injection configuration alone determines the resulting flow pattern. To the best of our knowledge, such a configuration-dependent set of regimes has not been reported before for this geometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fluids
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids11110277
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Mapping of Air–Water Two-Phase Flows: Configuration and Injection Effects in T-Junction Minichannels

Mustapha Habib, Jack Legrand, L. Tadrist, Nouara Ibrahim-Rassoul et al.
Fluids
Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
article

Experimental Mapping of Air–Water Two-Phase Flows: Configuration and Injection Effects in T-Junction Minichannels

Mustapha Habib, Jack Legrand, L. Tadrist, Nouara Ibrahim-Rassoul, Abdelaziz Rabehi, Yacine Salhi, Abdelkader Rouibah, El khider Si-Ahmed, Mohamed Trari
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates air–water two-phase flow regimes in a horizontal T-junction mini-channel with a 1 × 1 mm2 main mini-channel and a 0.3 × 0.3 mm2 side channel. The resulting cross-sectional area ratio of about 11:1 lies outside the range covered by most previous studies. Two injection configurations were compared systematically: in the first, air flows through the main channel and water enters through the side branch; in the second, the two ports are swapped. In the first configuration, the gas superficial velocity ranged from Jg = 1.7 × 10−3 to 1.5 m/s and the liquid superficial velocity from Jℓ = 2.7 × 10−3 to 0.1 m/s. In the second, Jg ranged from 1.5 × 10−2 to 12.5 m/s and Jℓ from 1.7 × 10−3 to 0.28 m/s. Six flow regimes were identified: monodispersed bubbles, slug–bubbles, slug–bubble–-slug, slug, wavy annular and annular flow. From these observations, flow maps were built for each configuration: one in terms of the superficial velocities Jg and Jℓ and one in terms of the momentum flux ratio XM and the gas Weber number Weg. The maps show that the flow pattern is strongly sensitive to the injection mode, and that the transition boundaries deviate substantially from those of maps in literature. The set of regimes itself also depends on the configuration. Slug–bubble–slug and annular flows occur only in the first configuration, whereas monodispersed bubbles, slug–bubbles and wavy annular flow occur only in the second. Slug flow is the only regime common to both. For instance, direct visual observation at identical flow rates confirms that the injection configuration alone determines the resulting flow pattern. To the best of our knowledge, such a configuration-dependent set of regimes has not been reported before for this geometry.

FluidsVol. 11(11)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene (DZ), Ziane Achour University of Djelfa (DZ), Renewable Energy Development Center (DZ), Laboratoire de Génie des Procédés – Environnement – Agro-alimentaire (FR), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon