Team learning behavior, value-based pricing, and information processing in start-up pricing teams

Pricing innovative products remains a central challenge for start-ups, particularly in dynamic environments with rapidly evolving customer preferences. Although prior research highlights the strategic importance of pricing, we know little about how start-ups process information to support decision-making. Addressing this gap, we integrate organizational learning theory with contingency theory to examine how team learning behavior relates to two information processing modes: rationality and intuition. We use data from 249 start-up CEOs in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, each reporting on pricing decisions for innovative products. Our findings, based on CEOs’ perceptions, show that team learning behavior is positively associated with reliance on rationality and negatively associated with dependence on intuition. Contrary to our expectations, value-based pricing does not strengthen these relationships. Instead, it is associated with a weaker relationship between team learning behavior and rationality, a pattern consistent with a misfit between the informational demands of value-based pricing and the scarce data available for innovative products. We contribute to the literature by uncovering the cognitive processes associated with how pricing teams learn, adapt, and make decisions under uncertainty, by highlighting the contingent role of strategic context in shaping these processes, and by deriving implications for entrepreneurs and start-up support programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Council for Small Business
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2026.2753695
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Team learning behavior, value-based pricing, and information processing in start-up pricing teams

Malte Brettel, Carolin Krieweth, Lukas Ellmann
Journal of the International Council for Small Business
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Team learning behavior, value-based pricing, and information processing in start-up pricing teams

Malte Brettel, Carolin Krieweth, Lukas Ellmann
article en

Abstract

Pricing innovative products remains a central challenge for start-ups, particularly in dynamic environments with rapidly evolving customer preferences. Although prior research highlights the strategic importance of pricing, we know little about how start-ups process information to support decision-making. Addressing this gap, we integrate organizational learning theory with contingency theory to examine how team learning behavior relates to two information processing modes: rationality and intuition. We use data from 249 start-up CEOs in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, each reporting on pricing decisions for innovative products. Our findings, based on CEOs’ perceptions, show that team learning behavior is positively associated with reliance on rationality and negatively associated with dependence on intuition. Contrary to our expectations, value-based pricing does not strengthen these relationships. Instead, it is associated with a weaker relationship between team learning behavior and rationality, a pattern consistent with a misfit between the informational demands of value-based pricing and the scarce data available for innovative products. We contribute to the literature by uncovering the cognitive processes associated with how pricing teams learn, adapt, and make decisions under uncertainty, by highlighting the contingent role of strategic context in shaping these processes, and by deriving implications for entrepreneurs and start-up support programs.

Journal of the International Council for Small Business
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon