AI Adoption in ASEAN Higher Education as a Digital Governance Challenge: A Scoping Review

Across the ten ASEAN member states, governments and regional bodies have produced more artificial intelligence (AI) policies for higher education (HE) in three years than the indexed empirical literature has generated to evaluate them. This scoping review treats that policy–evidence mismatch not as an educational-technology problem but as a digital-governance problem: a question of how policy ambition, institutional governance capacity, and educational-informatics infrastructure interact as one socio-technical system. Following Arksey and O’Malley (2005), refined by Levac et al. (2010) and reported under PRISMA-ScR, the Scopus records were screened alongside grey literature from ASEAN, UNESCO, and the World Bank. There are three contributions: we document the mismatch as a structural, not transitional, governance pattern; the Policy–Governance–Informatics (PGI) framework is also proposed, and its falsifiable weakest-layer-binds proposition; it is specified that the theoretical, methodological, and stakeholder gaps in a governance-focused research agenda must be addressed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v18i2.1280
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Adoption in ASEAN Higher Education as a Digital Governance Challenge: A Scoping Review

Budi Riyanto, Dendy Muris, Adrian Szilárd Nagy, Dhita Widya Putri et al.
JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

AI Adoption in ASEAN Higher Education as a Digital Governance Challenge: A Scoping Review

Budi Riyanto, Dendy Muris, Adrian Szilárd Nagy, Dhita Widya Putri, Yin Yucui, Chen Hantang, Sun Xinyuan
article en

Abstract

Across the ten ASEAN member states, governments and regional bodies have produced more artificial intelligence (AI) policies for higher education (HE) in three years than the indexed empirical literature has generated to evaluate them. This scoping review treats that policy–evidence mismatch not as an educational-technology problem but as a digital-governance problem: a question of how policy ambition, institutional governance capacity, and educational-informatics infrastructure interact as one socio-technical system. Following Arksey and O’Malley (2005), refined by Levac et al. (2010) and reported under PRISMA-ScR, the Scopus records were screened alongside grey literature from ASEAN, UNESCO, and the World Bank. There are three contributions: we document the mismatch as a structural, not transitional, governance pattern; the Policy–Governance–Informatics (PGI) framework is also proposed, and its falsifiable weakest-layer-binds proposition; it is specified that the theoretical, methodological, and stakeholder gaps in a governance-focused research agenda must be addressed.

JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open GovernmentVol. 18(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon